跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 03:01 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-07 17:43各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 03:44 — 2026-11-08 03:44(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 03:01最近发现新增版本:2026-11-07 17:43库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 02:59(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2501.17563

Search Trees on Trees via LP

Yaniv Sadeh, Haim Kaplan, Uri Zwick

原文摘要

We consider the problem of computing optimal search trees on trees (STTs). STTs generalize binary search trees (BSTs) in which we search nodes in a path (linear order) to search trees that facilitate search over general tree topologies. Golinsky proposed a linear programming (LP) relaxation of the problem of computing an optimal static STT over a given tree topology. He used this LP formulation to compute an STT that is a $2$-approximation to an optimal STT, and conjectured that it is, in fact, an extended formulation of the convex-hull of all depths-vectors of STTs, and thus always gives an optimal solution. In this work we study this LP approach further. We show that the conjecture is false and that Golinsky's LP does not always give an optimal solution. To show this we use what we call the ``normals method''. We use this method to enumerate over vertices of Golinsky's polytope for all tree topologies of no more than 8 nodes. We give a lower bound on the integrality gap of the LP and on the approximation ratio of Golinsky's rounding method. We further enumerate several research directions that can lead to the resolution of the question whether one can compute an optimal STT in polynomial time.

cs.DS

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05511

Improved lower bounds on the approximability of Multiway Cut using Sherali-Adams relaxations

Joshua Brakensiek, Neng Huang, Aaron Potechin, Uri Zwick

原文摘要

The Multiway Cut problem is among the most well-studied problems in the area of combinatorial approximation algorithms. The currently best approximation ratio for the problem is 1.2787, obtained recently by the authors (2026). The best lower bound on the approximation ratio that can be achieved for the problem in polynomial time, under the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC), is 1.20016, obtained by Bérczi, Chandrasekaran, Király, and Madan (2020), building on and slightly improving a bound of $\frac65=1.2$, obtained by Angelidakis, Makarychev, and Manurangsi (2017) by introducing the important framework of non-opposite multiway cuts. We obtain a substantially improved lower bound of 1.22232 on the approximation ratio of the Multiway Cut problem. Manokaran, Naor, Raghavendra, and Schwartz (2008) showed that under UGC, the approximation ratio of Multiway Cut is equal to the integrality ratio of a simple LP relaxation, known as the CKR relaxation, introduced by Călinescu, Karloff, and Rabani (2000). Thus, stronger LP relaxations are not required for obtaining an optimal approximation algorithm for the problem. We show, however, that relying on the framework of Angelidakis, Makarychev, and Manurangsi (2017), stronger LP relaxations from the Sherali-Adams hierarchy for non-opposite multiway cuts can be used to obtain improved integrality ratios for the CKR relaxation, and hence improved lower bounds on the approximation ratio of the Multiway Cut problem. One of the novel features of our analysis is considering a continuous limit of discrete LPs defined on a simplex. Our proof of the new 1.22232 bound is completely analytic. We also present strong numerical evidence that suggests that our techniques can be used to improve the lower bound to at least 1.23003.

cs.DS · cs.CC