跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 19:37 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 20:04 — 2026-11-09 20:04(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 19:37最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 19:35(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.07579

Per-Query Recall Guarantees for Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search in Dynamic Vector Databases

Woong-Kee Loh, Suan Lee

原文摘要

Vector search runs as an operator in database systems, where a missed neighbor can make a filter, join, or aggregate wrong, yet approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) indexes are tuned only for an average recall target. In our measurements, indexes tuned to an average recall of 0.99 left 5-19% of in-distribution queries and, tuned without a query log, up to 99.6% of real out-of-distribution queries below this target, and the misses grew under updates. We present PQR-Search, a k-ANN search method that guarantees $\Pr[\mathrm{Recall}(q)<τ]\leδ$ for every query. The probability is only over a random orthogonal transformation inside the index, so no distributional assumption is needed, only that queries and updates do not depend on it; the guarantee holds after insertions and deletions without retuning. PQR-Search stores 1-bit codes of rotated residuals with respect to IVF centroids and prunes with exact quantiles of their error distribution. A formula predicting the fraction of vectors that pass the code test, with no data-fitted constants, chooses index parameters and maintenance operations without affecting the guarantee. On 20 datasets of up to 100 million vectors, failure rates stayed at most $δ$ in every audit, including all 33 steps of the official NeurIPS'23 streaming runbook, whereas CTR, a conformal guarantee averaged over queries, left up to 16.4% of queries below the target. Where HNSW tuned to an average recall of 0.99 met that target, PQR-Search had 2.5x its single-query latency and 1.3x lower batch throughput, yet that HNSW still left 3-29% of queries below 0.99. PQR-Search was faster than FAISS exhaustive search in every static setting (26.4x geometric mean in batch; 69-154x at 100M scale), faster than IVF with nprobe chosen afterwards for every test query in all 52 main settings, and 27-76x faster at one thread than PUFFINN, which also gives per-query guarantees.

cs.DB