跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 06:08 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 06:14 — 2026-11-08 06:14(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 06:08最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 06:06(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.07717

Pediatric ECG foundation model via adult-to-pediatric fine-tuning: downstream tasks and clinical evaluation

Yu Cao, Haiyan Xu, Xiaohan Li, Jian Yang, Yuqing Feng, Wei Wang, Haomin Li

原文摘要

Pediatric electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation is complicated by age-dependent electrophysiological changes that limit direct transfer of adult AI models. We asked whether an adult ECG foundation model could be adapted to pediatric ECGs. Using 339,563 12-lead ECGs from 238,189 children, we compared direct application, pediatric fine-tuning, and training from scratch under an identical architecture. Direct transfer was poor (mean AUC 0.8256). Fine-tuning reached 0.9695, above de novo training (0.9661), and attained 0.9079 using only 1% of training data. On 10,999 external ECGs, fine-tuning achieved a mean AUC of 0.9385 across 30 labels. It generalized to age regression (MAE 1.12 years) and congenital heart disease classification (AUC 0.9562). Across 17 clinicians and 100 cases, diagnostic accuracy rose from 56.8% to 65.4% (p < 0.001) and did not decline when AI erred. Adult ECG foundation models require pediatric adaptation; fine-tuning offers a data-efficient route to scalable pediatric ECG AI.

cs.AI

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2611.02545

FindLink: Learning to Assess Scientific Connections from Source-Grounded Premises

Jingxuan Wei, Song Tan, Xiaohan Liu, Chao Sang, Changwei Wang, Linzhuang Sun, Bihui Yu, Fuqiang Wang 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

Scientific discovery from the literature requires assessing connections among findings obtained under different study conditions. Source attribution makes individual findings traceable, but does not determine what they jointly support. We introduce GI-TraceBench, a benchmark of 10,282 questions in gastrointestinal oncology that unifies provenance question answering, knowledge discovery, and hypothesis evaluation through shared Paper, Claim, and Evidence Span records. We further propose FindLink, a two-stage framework for provenance-grounded scientific reasoning. Premise Grounding constructs source-bound premises with explicit study context and support status. Structured Reasoning organizes these premises into support plans that represent both supported relations and unresolved conditions, then generates evidence-conditioned answers using deterministic compiler feedback. The compiler verifies structural and source-binding consistency, but does not assess scientific entailment. On the 1,545-question fixed-evidence test set, FindLink improves the balanced family macro score from 67.95 to 87.25 over direct supervised fine-tuning of the same backbone. A retrained variant without Structured Reasoning achieves slightly higher premise-identifier F1, but substantially lower relation and evidence-sufficiency F1. These results indicate that scientific reasoning requires not only identifying grounded premises, but also assessing what connections those premises support.

cs.CL