Zhengtao Liu, Jinrong Xu, Shiu-Hong Kao, Huixin Sun, Yicong Li
Online reasoning video segmentation (Online RVS) requires a model to segment query-referred objects as a video streams in, using only the frames observed so far. Existing formulations largely assume a fixed target set throughout the video, overlooking a fundamental property of streaming reasoning: as new events occur, the objects that satisfy a query may change over time. To address this, we propose a new task, Generalized Reasoning Video Segmentation (GRVS), where the target set depends on query-relevant events accumulated over the observed video history. As new evidence accumulates, the target set can evolve from empty to one or multiple objects, requiring a model to continuously maintain target validity while localizing the valid objects currently in view. To evaluate GRVS, we build Isekai, a diagnostic benchmark of 60 videos and 197 queries across 11 temporal query families, with 12,569 scoring points whose target sets are causally annotated over time. We further propose Sekai, an online framework with two complementary components: an Event Memory Reasoner (EMR) that maintains query-relevant events and evolving target states in structured memory, and a Memory-Grounded Decoder (MGD) that identifies valid targets from this memory and localizes them in the current frame. Experiments show that Sekai significantly outperforms existing online RVS methods, achieving 50.33 J&F and improving over the strongest baseline by 3.2 points. Code, example annotations, and evaluation scripts are available at https://github.com/zenastangbi/Sekai.
Human Motion Prediction (HMP) aims to predict future human poses at different moments according to observed past motion sequences. Previous approaches mainly treated the prediction of different temporal moments as a single prediction task and learned the predictions of varied moments simultaneously, which would encounter a main limitation: the learning of short-term predictions (referring to ``near-future'' prediction) could be hindered by the predictions of long-term (referring to ``far-future'' prediction) motions. In this paper, we develop a novel temporal continual learning framework called Continual Prior Compensation (CPC) to progressively train HMP models, in which we divide the prediction task of motions corresponding to varied temporal moments into several subtasks and train the model in a multi-stage manner. To mitigate the prior information forgetting in the progressive training, we further introduce a learnable random variable Prior Compensation Factor (PCF) to explicitly measure the prior knowledge loss. We theoretically show that the PCF can be efficiently learned together with the model parameters by minimizing a reasonable upper bound of the objective function. The proposed CPC is further enhanced to estimate the prior information loss for each subtask and a new framework called Continual Prior Compensation++ (CPC++) with Fine-Grained Prior Compensation Factor (FGPCF) is finally developed. Our CPC and CPC++ frameworks are quite flexible and can be easily integrated with different HMP backbone models and adapted to various datasets and applications. Extensive experiments on three HMP benchmark datasets using multiple SOTA HMP backbones (PGBIG, siMLPe, MotionMixer, and LTD) demonstrate the effectiveness and flexibility of our frameworks.
Recent interactive video world models generate visually compelling videos from a single image, following user-provided camera motion and text prompts. However, such low-level control demands substantial user effort to realize a high-level intent, and the generated world struggles to remain persistent as the exploration proceeds. In this work, we present AgiWorld, an agentic video world model that explores and builds a persistent world from a single image and a free-form instruction. For high-level planning, our agent AgiWorld-Agent designs the world and the journey through it in a world state and directs the exploration. For low-level realization, our video world model AgiWorld-WM generates the video chunk by chunk and stores it with its geometry in a spatial memory, from which the agent updates its world state. This closed loop keeps the world faithful to the user's intent and keeps the agent's world state consistent with the generated content throughout the exploration. We co-design the two levels around the shared spatial memory and an interface of metric camera trajectories and structured prompts. In AgiWorld-WM, to handle occlusion and accumulated geometric errors in the spatial memory over long rollouts, we propose occlusion-aware history selection, which retrieves past views by surface visibility, and reliability-based memory maintenance, which prefers reliable geometry and earlier observations. AgiWorld-WM achieves state-of-the-art overall performance on world revisiting and exploration benchmarks, and qualitative results and ablations show that AgiWorld builds persistent worlds from free-form instructions over minute-long journeys. Persistence thus arises not from the video model alone but from its closed loop with the agent.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored for mental health support, yet existing benchmarks primarily focus on supportive capabilities rather than whether models consistently adhere to professional ethical boundaries. This issue is particularly important in multi-turn interactions, where users may introduce new information or exert emotional pressure over time. We introduce MindEth-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating ethical boundary adherence in multi-turn mental health interactions. Grounded in professional ethical standards for mental health services in China, MindEth-Bench covers multiple dimensions of ethical conduct and uses Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to systematically explore interaction trajectories that stress-test model boundaries. Experiments across nine LLMs show that models that initially respond appropriately can shift toward ethical violations over extended interactions, with substantial variation across models and ethical dimensions. These results show that single-turn evaluations may overestimate the ethical reliability of LLM-based mental health support systems and highlight the need to evaluate ethical behavior throughout multi-turn interaction.
Xiangyu Li, Jincheng Li, Tianle Du, Yanheng Li, Haoxuan Che, Yuxin Sun, Long Bai, Liangliang Liu 等 9 位作者
A question about a whole-slide image rarely names every morphological finding needed to answer it. Question-guided patch selection can therefore overlook supporting morphology, while slide-level compression can dilute focal evidence. Inspired by how pathologists combine broad slide review, question-directed examination, and integration of their findings, we introduce BEYONDPATH, a Preserve-Focus-Fuse framework for whole-slide image question answering. Preserve learns a question-agnostic Morphology Bank through answer supervision across multiple questions about each training slide. Focus retrieves questionspecific evidence from all foreground patches, including regions outside the Bank. Fuse integrates the preserved morphology at the retrieved evidence positions through Morphology-on-Visual-Evidence Fusion, producing a fixed 96-token visual prefix. On WSI-Bench, BEYONDPATH achieves an Avg-9 of 0.769 and leads all eight reported report-generation metrics using the same checkpoint. It also achieves 0.639 zero-shot overall accuracy on SlideBench-BCNB. Controlled ablations show complementary benefits from morphology preservation and question-directed retrieval, and support cross-question supervision and fusion at the evidence positions. These results support looking beyond the question's explicit cues: preserving broader slide morphology while retaining the ability to seek evidence for each question.
Zixuan Xu, Haoxuan Chen, Jiangxin Sun, Jian-Fang Hu
Multi-reward reinforcement learning offers a promising framework for aligning large language models (LLMs) with diverse objectives, but conflicting reward signals can induce ambiguous update directions and hinder stable optimization. Existing approaches address such conflicts through reward reweighting, gradient coordination, or rollout filtering, yet they primarily operate on per-response or group-level optimization signals and underexploit relational information among sampled responses. As a result, conflict-filtered rollouts may still contain useful supervision that is discarded during training. We propose Group Pareto-Dominance Policy Optimization (GPDPO), a multi-reward policy optimization method that recovers pairwise supervision from conflict-filtered rollouts. GPDPO identifies Pareto-dominance relations among sampled responses and converts them into auxiliary preference signals, which are jointly optimized with the original policy objective. This enables more effective reuse of existing rollouts without additional sampling or reward evaluation. Experiments on API-Bank across multiple model scales and reward configurations show that GPDPO consistently outperforms competitive multi-reward optimization baselines. Further analysis demonstrates that GPDPO reduces both group-relative and pairwise reward conflicts, supporting the effectiveness of exploiting relational supervision for multi-reward alignment. Code will be released.
Artificial intelligence doctor assistants (AIDAs) help streamline clinical decision-making and reduce physician workload. While existing systems primarily utilize Large Language Models (LLMs) or retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), these methods typically retrieve static facts—whether as text passages or structured graphs—lacking the explicit logical pathways essential for multi-step reasoning. In this paper, we propose the AIDA-SEAT framework to provide reliable clinical decision-making support. First, we design the state-evaluation-action tree (SEAT), which covers diagnosis, treatment, and examination. To develop this tree, we refine and transform SEAT collected from medical documents and doctors. Then, we propose an adaptive method to select optimal trees tailored to the current patients’ state. Finally, we leverage LLMs to perform state assessment, evaluation, and action execution based on the tree, thereby generating reliable responses. To evaluate the effectiveness of our method, we conducted extensive experiments on a self-built dataset. Our method achieves 1.01% higher than current state-of-the-art (SOTA) baselines across five departments, including common RAG-based methods. Furthermore, analysis of 200 consultation records during deployment on an online hospital revealed that system-assisted responses are 24.16 seconds faster on average than manual ones, improving efficiency by 26.85%.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.AI
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 6: Industry Track) · 2026 · 正式发表
Xin Sun, Di Wu, Sijing Qin Hitotsubashi University, Isao Echizen National Institute of Informatics, Abdallah El Ali Utrecht University and Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica, Saku Sugawara University of Tokyo and National Institute of Informatics
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as automated evaluators (LLM-as-a-Judge). This work challenges its reliability by showing that trust judgments by LLMs are biased by disclosed source labels. Using a counterfactual design, we find that both humans and LLM judges assign higher trust to information labeled as human-authored than to the same content labeled as AI-generated. Eye-tracking data reveal that humans rely heavily on source labels as heuristic cues for judgments. We analyze LLM internal states during judgment. Across label conditions, models allocate denser attention to the label region than the content region, and this label dominance is stronger under Human labels than AI labels, consistent with the human gaze patterns. Besides, decision uncertainty measured by logits is higher under AI labels than Human labels. These results indicate that the source label is a salient heuristic cue for both humans and LLMs. It raises validity concerns for label-sensitive LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation, and we cautiously raise that aligning models with human preferences may propagate human heuristic reliance into models, motivating debiased evaluation and alignment.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Zongmin Li, Jian Su A*STAR, Farah Benamara, Aixin Sun Nanyang Technological University
Large language models (LLMs) are often assumed to contain "safety regions” - parameter subsets whose modification directly influences safety behaviors. We conduct a systematic evaluation of four safety region identification methods spanning different parameter granularities, from individual weights to entire Transformer layers, across four families of backbone LLMs with varying sizes. Using ten safety identification datasets, we find that the identified safety regions exhibit only low to moderate overlap, as measured by IoU. The overlap drops significantly when the safety regions are further refined using utility datasets (i.e. non-harmful queries). These results suggest that current techniques fail to reliably identify a stable, dataset-agnostic safety region.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Siqi Fan University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Xiusheng Huang, Yiqun Yao Spin Matrix and Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence, Xuezhi Fang, Kang Liu Institute of automation, Chinese academy of science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Peng Han University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Shuo Shang University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Aixin Sun Nanyang Technological University 等 9 位作者
Large language models (LLMs) can carry out human-like dialogue, but unlike humans, they are stateless due to the superposition property. However, during multi-turn, multi-agent interactions, LLMs begin to exhibit consistent, character-like behaviors—hinting at a form of emergent lifelong learning. Despite this, existing benchmarks often fail to capture these dynamics, primarily focusing on static, open-ended evaluations. To address this gap, we introduce LifeState-BENCH, a benchmark designed to assess lifelong learning in LLMs. It features two episodic datasets—Hamlet and a synthetic script collection—rich in narrative structure and character interactions. Our fact-checking evaluation probes models’ self-awareness, episodic memory retrieval, and relationship tracking, across both parametric and non-parametric approaches. Experiments on models like Llama3.1-8B, GPT-4-turbo, and DeepSeek R1, we demonstrate that non-parametric methods significantly outperform parametric ones in managing stateful learning. However, all models exhibit challenges with catastrophic forgetting as interactions extend, highlighting the need for further advancements in lifelong learning.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.MA
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表