跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2471新增论文
+2025其中 AI 相关
+163已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 05:58 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-10 15:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 06:37 — 2026-11-11 06:37(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 05:58最近发现新增版本:2026-11-10 15:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-10 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

20,643 已收录论文17,531 AI 相关5,643 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 05:57(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2611.00063

Where Generated Floor Plans Stop: Calibrated Sample-Level Checks Against a Built Baseline

Yiliang Shao

原文摘要

Floor plan generators are judged mainly by Compatibility, a graph edit distance to the requested adjacencies that is near saturation and blind to room shape. Our sample-level protocol calibrates each threshold no standard states at a declared false-rejection rate on real samples and grades them with the same checks. It reports each sample at its first failure, counts samples without a verdict apart, and attributes a stop to the generator or to its representation where a control exists. We apply it, with a production layout solver's checks, to four published generators against two built corpora, RPLAN and Modified Swiss Dwellings (MSD). A squareness check set per room type refuses 5 per cent of RPLAN apartments and 33.7 per cent of House-GAN++ plans. The gap survives resolution, tracing and orientation controls. Pooled over rooms, a Wasserstein distance on squareness orders the generators nearly as the check does but separates House-GAN++ from the built corpora by far less. Taken per plan on the check's worst-room margin, it separates them about fivefold to sevenfold. Within the GAN generators, Compatibility barely predicts which plans pass. We release the checker, which reproduces the solver's first failing check on 3,998 held-out RPLAN plans.

cs.CV