Xuan Wang Virginia Tech, Shuxiang Cao NVIDIA, Yuchen Zhuang Google DeepMind, Wenqi Shi University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Multi-agent systems powered by large language models (LLMs) offer a promising paradigm for tackling complex reasoning, decision-making, and problem-solving tasks. However, achieving both effectiveness and efficiency in such systems remains a critical challenge. This tutorial introduces recent advances in building effective and efficient multi-agent LLM systems, focusing on three core components. First, we discuss the design of individual LLM agents. We present state-of-the-art techniques for enabling capable agents using efficient and compact LLMs, including model distillation, dynamic routing, and memory- and compute efficient serving, providing a foundation for scalable and responsive agent design under resource constraints. Second, we cover coordination and communication among agents, crucial for collective performance, highlighting methods for improving multi-agent reasoning and decision-making through prompt and graph optimization, sycophancy mitigation, and structured LLM-based frameworks. Last, we explore real-world applications of LLM agents in areas such as industry, healthcare, quantum computing, and various scientific domains.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.MA
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 5: Tutorial Abstracts) · 2026 · 正式发表
Yubin Kim, Ken Gu, Chanwoo Park, Chunjong Park, Samuel Schmidgall, A. Ali Heydari, Yao Yan, Zhihan Zhang 等 20 位作者
Agents, language model-based systems capable of reasoning, planning, and acting are widely adopted in real-world tasks, yet how their performance changes as these systems scale across key dimensions remains underexplored. We introduce quantitative scaling principles for agent systems as a predictive model, capturing how performance varies with coordination, model capability, and measurable system and task factors. Across 260 configurations spanning six agentic benchmarks, five canonical architectures (Single-Agent and four Multi-Agent: Independent, Centralized, Decentralized, Hybrid), and three LLM families, we perform controlled evaluations, standardizing tools, prompts, and compute to isolate architectural effects. The resulting model achieves a cross-validated R^2=0.373 across all six benchmarks (R^2=0.413 with a task-grounded capability metric). We identify a robust capability-saturation effect and additional patterns: (1) a coordination yields diminishing returns once single-agent baselines exceed certain performance; (2) tool-heavy tasks appear to incur multi-agent overhead; and (3) architectures without centralized verification tend to propagate errors more than those with centralized coordination. Relative performance change compared to single-agent baseline ranges from +80.8% on decomposable financial reasoning to -70.0% on sequential planning, demonstrating that architecture-task alignment determines collaborative success. The framework identifies the best-performing architecture for 87% of held-out configurations and shows consistent relative architecture preferences on unseen frontier models. Agent effectiveness depends on alignment between coordination and task structure, and that mismatched coordination degrades the performance.