跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+5578新增论文
+4691其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 02:52 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 03:43各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 03:44 — 2026-11-05 03:44(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 02:52最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 03:43库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

14,255 已收录论文12,366 AI 相关3,088 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 02:50(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2607.28070

CCFormer: Efficient Cross-Field Interaction and Hierarchical Sequence Compression for Industrial Recommendation at Tencent

Yunlong Wang, Huizhe Zhang, Haonan Hu, Yudong Li, Bing Wen, Jianchao Tu, Chengxiang Zhuo, Zang Li

Industrial candidate-ranking systems must combine long user behavior histories with heterogeneous user and item features under strict computational budgets. We propose CCFormer, a structured interaction architecture that separates cross-field retrieval from intra-history modeling. Feature-field-separated cross-attention allows user and target queries to read an evolving history hierarchy, while local subspace token mixing contextualizes history tokens independently of candidate targets. Hierarchical sequence compression reduces the number of history tokens and provides multi-scale historical context for subsequent interactions. Experiments on two public benchmarks show higher mean AUC than the evaluated baselines, while experiments on a large-scale industrial dataset show a favorable accuracy-compute trade-off and higher training throughput than HSTU. Online A/B tests across four recommendation and advertising scenarios report system-level improvements of up to 3.57% in click-through rate, 3.86% in page views, and 1.71% in advertising revenue relative to the corresponding production baselines. CCFormer has been fully deployed in all four scenarios, demonstrating its practical scalability and effectiveness in large-scale recommendation systems.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.IR
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.35488

Benchmarking Coding Agents under Evolving Requirements

Jia Feng, Alyssa Wu, Cuiyun Gao, Yunlong Wang, Songyuanyi Lu, Zhichao Hu

Software development with coding agents often begins with a rough request that users refine after trying the implementation. Final correctness alone does not capture the repeated guidance this process requires. We introduce FeatureLoop, a benchmark of 61 human-reviewed tasks from 34 repositories across five primary programming languages and seven software forms. Each task follows one development goal in a persistent workspace through evolution feedback, which adds or clarifies requirements, and completion feedback, which reports failures of stated requirements. Cumulative executable checks track new behavior, repair, and preservation of earlier functionality. We evaluate 12 frontier models and find that the strongest completes 72.1% of tasks with both feedback types. Across models, however, only 15.4% of observed failed stages recover within two corrective revisions. Further analysis reveals incomplete repairs, regressions, and model-specific differences in feedback use and token efficiency, identifying obstacles to reliable, low-intervention development.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.SE · cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.37434

FeatureArc: Benchmarking Coding Agents on Evolving Features

Yunlong Wang, Alyssa Wu, Cuiyun Gao, Jia Feng, Songyuanyi Lu, Zhichao Hu

A software feature usually evolves over time: developers extend its first version as new use cases and requirements arrive, and each extension builds on code written earlier. Most feature benchmarks evaluate a single request on a fixed codebase. Feature evolution requires evaluating successive extensions on an agent's own earlier code and checking whether the feature remains correct. We introduce FeatureArc to evaluate coding agents on evolving features, together with a pipeline that constructs its tasks from repository histories. The benchmark combines dependencies between successive stages of the same feature, explicit requirements and interface contracts, and executable checks across four programming languages. The pipeline validates fail-to-pass (F2P) tests for new behavior and pass-to-pass (P2P) tests for existing behavior on the reference code before and after each stage. We evaluated 10 coding agents on 73 manually reviewed tasks of 2 to 10 stages. Each agent works in one persistent session and workspace without external test feedback or rollback. The evaluation reveals a gap between first-stage and whole-feature success: pooled success falls from 62.7% at the first stage to 28.5% when the whole feature is tested on the final code. Trajectory analysis identifies inherited defects as a common failure mechanism, present in 72.9% of failed later stages. These earlier errors often remain undetected: in stages following a failure, agents leave the earlier error unnoticed about 95% of the time, and their self-tests rarely revisit earlier stages. Evolving a feature autonomously, without human checks between stages, therefore remains a substantial challenge for current coding agents. At Tencent, the pipeline extends internal evaluations to this setting and guides the development of Hunyuan, Tencent's family of large language models.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.SE · cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗