跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+3已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-14 18:17 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-13 19:22 — 2026-11-14 19:22(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-14 18:17最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-14 18:15(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.16725

Safe and Efficient Navigation Considering Texting Pedestrians via Attention-Aware Cost-map Tuning

Shunya Tadano, Yusuke Tamura, Ankit A. Ravankar, Yasuhisa Hirata

原文摘要

Smartphone-distracted pedestrians deviate from social norms unpredictably and cannot be relied upon to yield to approaching robots -- a safety challenge that existing navigation methods are poorly equipped to handle, since they treat all pedestrians uniformly regardless of attention state. We propose an attention-aware navigation framework that classifies each pedestrian as attentive or distracted in real-time using 3D skeletal features and a Random Forest classifier, then dynamically widens cost-map safety margins around distracted individuals to drive proactive avoidance. A within-subjects user study with 12 participants across 252 trials demonstrates significant improvements in perceived smoothness (p = 0.003) and predictability (p = 0.034) over both a LiDAR-only baseline and a trajectory-prediction-only method, without any increase in travel time. Notably, trajectory prediction alone does not improve subjective navigation quality unless coupled with attention-state-aware cost adjustment -- confirming that appropriately responding to who is in front of the robot can matter more than trajectory smoothness alone.

cs.RO