跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+7272新增论文
+6090其中 AI 相关
+125已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 20:32 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 21:23 — 2026-11-05 21:23(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 20:32最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 4 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 20:29(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.12235

Language Models as AI Research World Models

Zijun Wang, Zewen Liu, Minhua Lin, Zhaotian Weng, Zhan Shi, Bing He, Yisi Sang, Dakuo Wang 等 13 位作者

AI research agents automate the cycle of proposing, implementing, and evaluating experiments, opening a path toward recursive self-improvement. Yet their ability to propose experiments outpaces their capacity to execute them in real environments, making outcome prediction a key capability for sustained self-improvement under limited experimental budgets. We investigate language models as Research World Models (RWMs), which predict the outcomes of candidate interventions across research environments. Our evaluation draws on over 2,600 experimental records from nine research environments spanning pretraining, post-training, and inference, representing more than 171,000 H100 GPU-hours of experimentation. Research knowledge acquired from real experimental experience improves RWM predictions of unseen interventions within the same environment (Spearman +0.27), and can be reused across environments. For example, using only pretraining experience from OLMo3, Marin, and Nanochat, an RWM reduces selection regret in the Qwen3 environment by 78% compared with zero-experience setting. These benefits extend to multi-round Autoresearch under a fixed selection budget: RWMs with in-env and cross-env research knowledge increase the best gain achieved by 15.8% and 11.6%, respectively. Ablations across 13 language models used as RWMs show that adding research knowledge can improve intervention ranking more than changing models or increasing reasoning effort alone. These findings support language models as RWMs and motivate accumulating experimental data for future RWM training.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2602.11499

ImagineAgent: What if Agents Could Imagine? Reinforcing Open-Vocabulary HOI Comprehension through Generation

Zhenlong Yuan, Yue Wang, Dapeng Zhang, Kejin Cui, Rui Chen, Jing Tang, Lei Sun, Hongwei Yu 等 12 位作者

Multimodal Large Language Models have shown promising capabilities in bridging visual and textual reasoning, yet their reasoning capabilities in Open-Vocabulary Human-Object Interaction (OV-HOI) are limited by cross-modal hallucinations and limited viewpoints of images. To address this, we propose ImagineAgent, an agentic framework that integrates cognitive mapping, tool-augmented reinforcement learning (RL), and generative world modeling for robust OV-HOI understanding. Specifically, we first propose an innovative CoT dataset named hicodet-6K for supervised fine-tuning (SFT), which effectively bridges the perception-to-cognition gap by structuring perceived entities into interaction pairs for comprehensive predictions. Subsequently, we develop a multimodal tool library integrating online retrieval, image cropping, and generative modeling, enabling the agent to dynamically augment reasoning with domain-specific tools to resolve visual-semantic ambiguities and hallucinations during inference. Moreover, we incorporate a generative model to reconstruct alternative viewpoints, enabling the agent to 'imagine' under limited viewpoints. Finally, we propose a composite reward mechanism to jointly optimize prediction accuracy and tool efficiency. Evaluations on both SWIG-HOI and HICO-DET datasets demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance while requiring merely 36.7% of the training data compared to existing methods, validating our robustness, empirical effectiveness and efficiency.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CV
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02412

A Novel Federated Learning Framework for Defending Against Gradient Inversion Attacks

Pengxin Guo, Ziying Huang, Shuang Zeng, Xiaodan Zhang, Weihong Ren, Yuyin Zhou, Liangqiong Qu

Federated Learning (FL) offers a paradigm for collaborative machine learning model training among clients, preserving data privacy by avoiding direct data sharing. However, the gradient information exchanged in FL has been shown to be vulnerable to Gradient Inversion Attacks (GIA), which can reconstruct sensitive user data. To counter these threats, various privacy-enhancing technologies like Secure Multi-party Computing (SMC), Homomorphic Encryption (HE), and Differential Privacy (DP) have been integrated into FL. While effective, these methods often introduce significant trade-offs between privacy and model utility. By revisiting the key to privacy exposure in FL under GIA, which lies in the frequent sharing of model gradients that contain private data, we take a new perspective by designing a novel privacy-preserving FL framework that effectively ``breaks the direct connection'' between the shared parameters and the local private data to defend against GIA. Our proposed framework, HyperFL++, leverages hypernetworks to generate local model parameters, where only the hypernetwork parameters are aggregated by the server. To ensure practicality, HyperFL++ incorporates a Row-wise Kronecker Decomposition (RKD) to mitigate the memory and communication overhead from the hypernetwork. Comprehensive theoretical analysis and extensive experiments validate our method's effectiveness in protecting data privacy while maintaining high model utility. Our code is available at https://github.com/Pengxin-Guo/HyperFL/tree/hyperfl%2B%2B.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2605.20025Google Research

AutoResearchClaw: Self-Reinforcing Autonomous Research with Human-AI Collaboration

Jiaqi Liu, Shi Qiu, Mairui Li, Bingzhou Li, Haonian Ji, Siwei Han, Xinyu Ye, Peng Xia 等 36 位作者

Automating scientific discovery requires more than generating papers from ideas. Real research is iterative: hypotheses are challenged from multiple perspectives, experiments fail and inform the next attempt, and lessons accumulate across cycles. Existing autonomous research systems often model this process as a linear pipeline: they rely on single-agent reasoning, stop when execution fails, and do not carry experience across runs. We present AutoResearchClaw, a multi-agent autonomous research pipeline built on five mechanisms: structured multi-agent debate for hypothesis generation and result analysis, a self-healing executor with a \textsc{Pivot}/\textsc{Refine} decision loop that transforms failures into information, verifiable result reporting that prevents fabricated numbers and hallucinated citations, human-in-the-loop collaboration with seven intervention modes spanning full autonomy to step-by-step oversight, and cross-run evolution that converts past mistakes into future safeguards. On ARC-Bench, a 25-topic experiment-stage benchmark, AutoResearchClaw outperforms AI Scientist v2 by 54.7%. A human-in-the-loop ablation across seven intervention modes reveals that precise, targeted collaboration at high-leverage decision points consistently outperforms both full autonomy and exhaustive step-by-step oversight. We position AutoResearchClaw as a research amplifier that augments rather than replaces human scientific judgment. Code is available at https://github.com/aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗