跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+3新增论文
+3其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-12 12:06 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-11 13:56 — 2026-11-12 13:56(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-12 12:06最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-12 12:05(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.12243

CADMA: Capacity-Aware Coverage Decomposition for Generative Model Assessment

Debin Meng, Zheng Gao, Ziquan Liu, Yanran Li, Ioannis Patras, Georgios Tzimiropoulos

原文摘要

Evaluating generative models requires measuring not only sample fidelity but also how well a generated set covers the real data distribution. Recent work has therefore introduced recall-oriented metrics for distribution-level evaluation. However, existing recall metrics often reduce distributional coverage to geometry-based coverage. This simplifying assumption weakens their diagnostic value and interpretability in two ways: these metrics provide only a single aggregate score that cannot distinguish essential diversity failures such as mode dropping and mode collapse, and geometry-based coverage can provide unreliable estimates by assigning high scores to poorly covered generative distributions. We therefore introduce CADMA, a capacity-aware framework for recall-oriented evaluation and diagnosis. CADMA evaluates distributional coverage through local capacity matching between real and generated samples, separating geometry-based coverage from effective coverage. This yields multi-dimensional coverage diagnostics that quantify mode dropping and mode collapse while reducing the overly optimistic estimates produced by geometry-based metrics. Through extensive experiments on toy data, real-world datasets, and generative models, we show that CADMA provides more reliable coverage estimates and more fine-grained, interpretable diagnostic signals of diversity failures than existing metrics. Our code is available at https://github.com/Open-Debin/CADMA_NeurIPS2026.

cs.CV · cs.LG

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2611.03698

Training LLM Agents to Automate LLM Post-Training with RSI-Dojo

Shuzheng Gao, Zhaojian Yu, Penghao Yin, Yuling Shi, Kai Cai, Shilin He, Michael R. Lyu

原文摘要

Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) aims to enable AI systems to autonomously build and improve AI systems themselves, including models, harnesses, and underlying infrastructure. Within this broader agenda, a central capability is enabling agents to train and improve base models. However, existing studies on automated model training primarily focused on workflow- or harness-level optimizations, rather than internalizing the ability to conduct post-training into the model itself. Developing this capability requires executable model training environments that can produce high-quality trajectories demonstrating how to select data, train models, diagnose failures, and iteratively improve results. In this paper, we introduce RSI-Dojo, a collection of executable model training environments designed to teach LLM agents to conduct post-training. To construct RSI-Dojo, we develop RSI-Craft, an automatic pipeline that converts human research artifacts into executable model training environments. RSI-Craft automatically collects research papers from top venues, instantiates datasets and metrics into a unified interface, and reproduces evaluation dependencies. It then filters tasks by data size, execution reliability, and discriminability, yielding RSI-Dojo with 281 seed model training tasks. Building on RSI-Dojo, we employ a trajectory collection method with an improved harness to collect high-quality model-training trajectories from frontier models, then retain examples through rubric-based and outcome-based filtering. We fine-tune Qwen3.5-9B and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on these trajectories. The resulting RSI-Dojo-9B and RSI-Dojo-35B-A3B improve over their base models by 8.74 and 16.87 PostTrainBench points, respectively. RSI-Dojo-35B-A3B reaches 29.95 on PostTrainBench and 53.29 on PostTrainBench-Lite, matching the performance of frontier models such as GLM-5.2 and GPT 5.5.

cs.AI