论文库

We present Meituan-Robotics-0 (MR0), a vision-language-action foundation model and embodied-agent system for stationary-base desktop manipulation. MR0 combines 147 million vision-language samples with 15,060 hours of curated robot trajectories spanning 12 embodiments. A three-stage training recipe aligns multimodal representations with robot behavior through discrete action-token pre-training, transfers these priors to continuous cross-embodiment control through flow-matching mid-training, and adapts the policy through real-world post-training. We introduce Rollback, which pairs replaced policy segments with human corrections to provide positive and negative supervision for CFG-DAgger without value learning or advantage labeling. A unified end-effector interface supports heterogeneous embodiments, while asynchronous action-chunk merging maintains smooth execution under variable inference latency. An event-driven agent maintains persistent task events and reassesses plans when progress or feasibility changes, enabling cross-task retrieval and conditional task resumption. MR0 achieves 93.6% success on RoboTwin 2.0 and ranks fifth in the RoboDojo VLA track. Under matched HG-DAgger post-training, MR0 achieves higher average success rate and progress score than $π_{0.5}$ across three real-robot tasks. On Ethernet insertion, CFG-DAgger trained with Rollback data reaches 70% success and a progress score of 0.90. Qualitative agent deployments demonstrate cross-task event retrieval and recovery from temporarily unsatisfied task conditions.

Video world models promise general-purpose interactive simulators, but their training is limited by action supervision: action labels are scarce, fragmented across incompatible specifications, and do not scale with the unlabeled video pretraining corpus. A common workaround jointly trains an action encoder to compress consecutive frames into a latent action and a decoder to reconstruct the next frame from the previous frame and that latent, forcing the latent to capture only new information. This has two limitations: learning the action space from scratch can limit generalization to unseen domains, and the bottleneck trades expressiveness for separation, with tighter settings losing nuance and looser ones risking scene leakage under domain shifts. We argue for a different starting point: rather than learning actions from scratch, we start from a pretrained foundation model (V-JEPA 2), whose embeddings of a frame pair already carry substantial action information after large-scale, diverse video pretraining. The remaining challenge is to extract the action while discarding the scene. We propose a label-free contrastive adaptation framework that pulls together frame pairs sharing the same motion under a different scene and pushes apart pairs from the same scene with different motion, reshaping the geometry of the pretrained space without imposing a reconstruction bottleneck. We introduce a unified evaluation protocol along three axes (action expressiveness, scene invariance, and action-conditioned video generation quality) across robot manipulation, camera navigation, game, and driving benchmarks, most of which are unseen during adaptation. Compared with annotation-free latent-action methods, our representations are substantially more expressive while matching their scene invariance, and they yield world models that transfer demonstrated actions to new scenes more faithfully.

Research agents achieve increasingly strong benchmark scores, yet these scores do not necessarily translate into reliable delivery in ongoing research projects. Many research-agent benchmarks emphasize standalone tasks and relatively self-contained workflows in clean or curated workspaces. However, researchers ask agents to complete one step within an ongoing project, where requests depend on earlier session decisions and workspaces contain unfinished files, outdated versions, and failed attempts. We introduce ARE-bench to evaluate whether research agents advance ongoing projects while respecting prior decisions and existing workspace state, grounded in real session context and in-progress workspaces. ARE-bench includes 75 tasks built on agent sessions and full workspaces from recruited researchers' own projects, spanning seven research stages, 33 requirements, and 150 sub-requirements, with 1,173 binary checklist items in total. Each task is anchored at a real user request, preserves its requirements, and summarizes the earlier requests still in effect as background. The complete workspace is replayed to that boundary without cleanup, preserving artifacts from earlier turns. Each checklist is compiled from an intent-aligned rubric and credits any valid solution. Across seven frontier models, the strongest passes every checklist item on only 66.2% of tasks, and Design and Execution rank among the hardest stages for every model. Three models pass about 69% of tasks when only delivery contracts and general norms are checked, but just 28.4% to 40.0% once historical and material or workspace requirements are also checked. Evaluating delivery without these contextual requirements can therefore overestimate research agents and mask differences between them.