跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 04:40 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 05:05 — 2026-11-15 05:05(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 04:40最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 04:38(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.14026

Energy-Proportional Serverless Computing on SBC Clusters

Yuliya Sasinskaya, Natalie Carl, Niklas Kowallik, David Bermbach

原文摘要

Serverless computing promises to run code only on demand, yet the servers beneath it draw most of their power while idle, so energy consumption does not scale to zero with the workload. We show that the statelessness of serverless functions makes it possible to extend scale-to-zero from function instances to physical nodes, enabling energy proportionality. Our platform, built on tinyFaaS for clusters of single-board computers, treats node power state as part of worker selection, powering workers off when idle and back on under load. On a physical cluster, our approach reduces mean power draw by 39.6 % on a bursty, trace-based workload and by 46.7 % on a sparse one, without a detectable change in median latency on the bursty workload. The cost lands in the tail, where invocations that arrive while all workers are off wait about a minute for a node to boot. Under continuous load, the platform behaves like an always-on cluster.

cs.DC

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02990

Same Function, Different CPU: Quantifying Hardware Heterogeneity in Commercial FaaS Platforms

Jonas Heisterberg, Natalie Carl, Trever Schirmer, David Bermbach

原文摘要

Serverless computing, particularly Function-as-a-Service (FaaS), abstracts operational concerns such as scaling, scheduling, and resource management from users. This abstraction, however, conceals a heterogeneous hardware fleet on which function execution environments are scheduled behind a unified function interface. Consequently, otherwise identical invocations may run on different CPU types that differ in performance, a hardware lottery that users can neither see nor control. Since the resulting variability is entangled with other sources, such as noisy neighbors or diurnal effects, its contribution to overall performance variability and how this contribution differs across providers remain unclear. In this paper, we systematically study hardware heterogeneity and its impact on function performance across four widely used commercial FaaS platforms, covering regional, configurational, and temporal differences. Using variance decomposition, we find that CPU heterogeneity alone explains 4 % to 97 % of the performance variance on AWS Lambda and Google Cloud Run Functions. On Azure Functions, in contrast, we identify a platform-level mechanism that produces bimodal execution durations and overshadows CPU effects. We observe that the CPU composition on AWS Lambda shifts within a single week. Additionally, we reveal that on Google Cloud Run Functions and Alibaba Function Compute, the availability of instruction set extensions such as SHA-NI differs between CPU types, widening the performance gap further. Since all platforms bill by duration, performance gaps between CPU types translate directly into cost, with invocations on the slowest CPU type costing up to three times as much as those on the fastest.

cs.DC