跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 09:49 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 10:49 — 2026-11-15 10:49(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 09:49最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 09:48(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2610.19148

Program Learning with Verifiable Rewards: Distilling Expert Traces into Programs

Vishvesh Bhat, Muhammad Ahmed Mohsin, Asad Aali

原文摘要

Small language models struggle with tool-use tasks that require following multi-step procedures. Whether these failures reflect limited capability or missing procedural knowledge remains unclear. We introduce Program Learning with Verifiable Rewards (PLVR), which distils expert traces into reusable programs without updating model weights. Frontier models turn recurring operations in the traces into typed primitives and rules, and search assembles them using reference actions and training-task checks. A small frozen model executes the primitives, with deterministic verifiers checking their outputs. The resulting program guides a student's reasoning or checks its proposed actions. We evaluate the same program across students on $τ^2$-Bench Retail and Telecom and LiveMCPBench, using synthetic training tasks and unseen benchmark test tasks. On Telecom, PLVR raises an 8B model's success rate from 43.0% to 91.2%, while larger students reach up to 94.4%, compared with 57.9% for the best baseline. On Retail and LiveMCPBench, PLVR is competitive with the best baselines, although tool search remains more dependent on the student model. These results support program learning as a way to transfer expert procedures across frozen models, trading additional inference computation for more reliable tool use.

cs.AI · cs.SC

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2607.04096

Forethought: Verifiable Reasoning from Neurosymbolic Primitive Programming

Vishvesh Bhat, Emmanuel Anaya Gonzalez, Jay Vaghasiya, Asad Aali

原文摘要

Modern agentic workflows decompose user requests into sequences of tool calls with correctly resolved parameters, the results of which are processed through reasoning traces in the language model's context window. The prevailing route to improving such reasoning is test-time scaling, which trains models to search over long chains of thought; but the resulting capability is entangled in model weights, cannot be checked step by step, and is costly at inference. We present Forethought, a neurosymbolic reasoning system built from a library of symbolic and neural primitives composed through a typed domain-specific language. The results are reasoning programs: concrete representations of the model's work, in which every step carries an output contract that is checked at design time and enforced at execution time. Symbolic steps hold by construction, while learned steps are contract-checked and empirically validated, giving an explicit boundary between what is guaranteed and what is measured. Instantiated as a tool-calling execution kernel and evaluated on four standard tool-calling benchmark suites, Forethought improves end-to-end accuracy by a median of 32% relative to prompting the same base model directly, and reaches the highest aggregate accuracy among the evaluated configurations, though only by a margin within single-run noise over a frontier model. Systems pairing small open models with Forethought's fixed small-model layer match that frontier model, and a pipeline with a non-reasoning responder outperforms its reasoning sibling while requiring only a single fine-tuning stage. Removing the contract-and-control layer erases most of these gains, showing that checked structure, not decomposition alone, drives the improvement. Our results show the potential of rich symbolic orchestrators for building language-model agents that are more accurate, reliable, and auditable.

cs.AI

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2604.02434

Compositional Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning

Anugyan Das, Omkar Ghugarkar, Vishvesh Bhat, Asad Aali

原文摘要

We study structured abstraction-based reasoning for the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) and compare its generalization to test-time approaches. Purely neural architectures lack reliable combinatorial generalization, while strictly symbolic systems struggle with perceptual grounding. We therefore propose a neuro-symbolic architecture that extracts object-level structure from grids, uses neural priors to propose candidate transformations from a fixed domain-specific language (DSL) of atomic patterns, and filters hypotheses using cross-example consistency checks. Instantiated as a compositional reasoning framework based on unit patterns inspired by human visual abstraction, the system augments large language models (LLMs) with object representations and transformation proposals. On ARC-AGI-2, it improves over the base solver LLM (Grok-4, 16.0%) to 24.4% on the public evaluation set, and to 30.8% when combined with ARC Lang Solver via a meta-classifier. These results support the claim that in the evaluated settings, allocating test-time compute to object abstraction, neural-guided transformation proposal, and consistency filtering can improve accuracy over unstructured sampling-based scaling without task-specific finetuning of the system. We open-source the code: (https://github.com/CoreThink-AI/arc-agi-2-reasoner).

cs.AI