论文库

原文摘要

Evaluating generative models requires measuring not only sample fidelity but also how well a generated set covers the real data distribution. Recent work has therefore introduced recall-oriented metrics for distribution-level evaluation. However, existing recall metrics often reduce distributional coverage to geometry-based coverage. This simplifying assumption weakens their diagnostic value and interpretability in two ways: these metrics provide only a single aggregate score that cannot distinguish essential diversity failures such as mode dropping and mode collapse, and geometry-based coverage can provide unreliable estimates by assigning high scores to poorly covered generative distributions. We therefore introduce CADMA, a capacity-aware framework for recall-oriented evaluation and diagnosis. CADMA evaluates distributional coverage through local capacity matching between real and generated samples, separating geometry-based coverage from effective coverage. This yields multi-dimensional coverage diagnostics that quantify mode dropping and mode collapse while reducing the overly optimistic estimates produced by geometry-based metrics. Through extensive experiments on toy data, real-world datasets, and generative models, we show that CADMA provides more reliable coverage estimates and more fine-grained, interpretable diagnostic signals of diversity failures than existing metrics. Our code is available at https://github.com/Open-Debin/CADMA_NeurIPS2026.