跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 00:32 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 01:07 — 2026-11-15 01:07(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 00:32最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 00:30(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.13741

Retargetable Compilation for Tensor Kernels via a Unified Layout Abstraction

Likai Ma, Renze Chen, Tianqi Li, Yuhao Luo, Youwei Xiao, Size Zheng, Xiuhong Li, Yun Liang

原文摘要

Modern hardware accelerators achieve high performance through specialized instructions coupled with tightly managed memory hierarchies. These instructions impose strict layout requirements on their operands: where tensor fragments reside, how they are organized, and how parallel units access them. Such instruction-visible layout is critical to kernel performance, as it determines whether instructions execute correctly and how much data movement they incur. However, existing compilers either scatter layout requirements across handwritten programs and local scheduling rules, or provide layout representations and conversions specific to a single class of targets. Both approaches expose the same abstraction gap: the absence of a unified model for instruction layout requirements across backends. This paper presents Arknife, a retargetable compiler that treats instruction-visible layout as first-class instruction semantics. Its central idea is a constraint-based layout algebra: tensor layouts map logical axes to hardware axes spanning parallel levels and memory spaces. Instruction operands declare layout requirements, and target-provided repairs resolve conflicts. Layouts are then solved globally across the program. ISA-specific layout facts are supplied by target-side instruction descriptions rather than hardcoded in the compiler. Retargeting reuses the layout algebra and solver while defining the new target's instructions and their operand requirements. We evaluate Arknife across x86 CPU, Hexagon NPU, and NVIDIA A100 GPU. Arknife matches cuBLAS on A100, and on x86 and Hexagon outperforms vendor-optimized libraries by $2.17\times$ and $3.78\times$ and the retargetable compiler MISAAL by $5.08\times$ and $4.53\times$, respectively.

cs.PL

版本更新 · v3arXiv:2610.35581

Integrate the Reward, Don't Sample It: Window Likelihood for Interruptions and Backchannels in Full-Duplex Speech Models

Guoqiang Hu, Lichao Zhang, Yizhou Peng, Yuhao Luo, Haifeng Hu, Zhongqian Sun, Wei Yang, Eng Siong Chng

原文摘要

When a user talks over a full-duplex dialogue model, it must decide whether the user is interrupting (stop) or backchannelling (carry on). Post-training can improve this discrimination or change how readily it stops. In our GRPO runs the second dominates: no configuration lowers both error rates on more than one model, and two released checkpoints discriminate no better than their bases. We trace this partly to how the reward is estimated. The probability of stopping inside a short window is a known function of a few stop probabilities the policy emits, yet GRPO estimates it by sampling. A group of rollouts that all agree gives no gradient, even when all fail; the push on the stop threshold is strongest where the model is unsure, whichever outcome is right; and whole-rollout credit reaches decisions the reward never judges. Confining the credit to the window removes only that leakage. Window likelihood (WL) samples the words but integrates over the stop decisions, so the probability of the correct outcome is computed exactly and its logarithm maximised. On HumDial-FDBench, across four open models, WL gives the best F1 and lowers both error rates by more than their confidence intervals, without talking into silence.

eess.AS · cs.CL · cs.SD

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11516

Breaking survivorship bias in driving world models

Zihao Sheng, Zilin Huang, Yuhao Luo, Zhengyang Wan, Boyue Wang, Soyoung Ahn, David A. Noyce, Sikai Chen

原文摘要

World models allow autonomous vehicles to imagine the consequences of candidate actions before execution, but their reliability depends on the futures represented in their training data. We identify a survivorship bias in driving world models: because the futures recorded in prevailing driving datasets almost always end safely, existing models often imagine benign outcomes even when a collision is imminent. We introduce a neutral world model (NWM) that learns both routine and safety-critical futures from a mixture of routine driving and real accident videos with a bounding-box-guided objective. The NWM more faithfully anticipates imminent collisions, while maintaining a low false collision rate and competitive generation quality in routine driving. We further use the model as an imagination engine for decision-making. Given multiple ego trajectories, the NWM predicts the future associated with each candidate, and a reward function evaluates these imagined outcomes before selecting an action. On challenging NAVSIM scenarios, this procedure selects the better trajectory more reliably than the baseline world model. Zero-shot experiments with real-world pedestrian dummy crossing data collected using an autonomous research vehicle further demonstrate transfer to unseen sensor observations. These results show that correcting survivorship bias enables world models to more faithfully reason about futures and support safety-critical decision-making in autonomous driving.

cs.RO