跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2507.11662 · v4

Let's Think in Two Steps: Mitigating Agreement Bias in MLLMs with Self-Grounded Verification

首次提交 2025-07-16 02:50
版本更新 2026-11-11 10:30
雷达观测 2026-11-13 11:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Verifiers--functions assigning rewards to agent behavior--have been key to AI progress in math, code, and games. However, extending gains to domains without clear-cut success criteria (e.g., computer use) remains a challenge: while humans can recognize desired outcomes, translating this intuition into scalable rules is nontrivial. Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) offer a promising solution, given their world knowledge, human-preference alignment, and reasoning skills. We evaluate MLLM verifiers across web navigation, computer use, and robotics, spanning 13 models, 28 judge designs, diverse agent trajectories, and distinct downstream applications. We identify a critical limitation: a strong tendency for MLLMs to over-validate agent behavior, a phenomenon we term agreement bias. This bias is pervasive across models, is resilient to test-time scaling, and harms pipelines relying on MLLM judgments (e.g., self-improvement). We discuss principles for design and evaluation of verifiers, and introduce SGV, a method that improves verification by harnessing MLLMs' own capabilities via modulation of (un)conditional generation. First, an MLLM generates broad priors about desired behavior, independent of the data under evaluation. Then, conditioned on generated priors, it reasons over and judges a candidate trajectory. Our methods yield more human-aligned verifiers, with gains of up to 25pp in failure detection, 14pp in accuracy, and benefits extending to downstream applications. In self-improvement and online supervision, our verifiers boost task completion of a GUI specialist in OSWorld, a diffusion policy in robomimic, and a ReAct agent in VisualWebArena--surpassing the previous SOTA by 20pp. Finally, we release an updated version of VisualWebArena, featuring improved evaluators, high-fidelity environment parallelism with >10x speedups, and VWA-Lite, a 1/3-scale subset with comparable evaluation fidelity.

作者备注:ICLR 2026. Code, models, and data publicly available at https://mshalimay.github.io/agreement-bias-sgv/

期刊信息:Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2026)

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v4 · 2026-11-11 10:30 · 最新观测版本

Let's Think in Two Steps: Mitigating Agreement Bias in MLLMs with Self-Grounded Verification

Verifiers--functions assigning rewards to agent behavior--have been key to AI progress in math, code, and games. However, extending gains to domains without clear-cut success criteria (e.g., computer use) remains a challenge: while humans can recognize desired outcomes, translating this intuition into scalable rules is nontrivial. Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) offer a promising solution, given their world knowledge, human-preference alignment, and reasoning skills. We evaluate MLLM verifiers across web navigation, computer use, and robotics, spanning 13 models, 28 judge designs, diverse agent trajectories, and distinct downstream applications. We identify a critical limitation: a strong tendency for MLLMs to over-validate agent behavior, a phenomenon we term agreement bias. This bias is pervasive across models, is resilient to test-time scaling, and harms pipelines relying on MLLM judgments (e.g., self-improvement). We discuss principles for design and evaluation of verifiers, and introduce SGV, a method that improves verification by harnessing MLLMs' own capabilities via modulation of (un)conditional generation. First, an MLLM generates broad priors about desired behavior, independent of the data under evaluation. Then, conditioned on generated priors, it reasons over and judges a candidate trajectory. Our methods yield more human-aligned verifiers, with gains of up to 25pp in failure detection, 14pp in accuracy, and benefits extending to downstream applications. In self-improvement and online supervision, our verifiers boost task completion of a GUI specialist in OSWorld, a diffusion policy in robomimic, and a ReAct agent in VisualWebArena--surpassing the previous SOTA by 20pp. Finally, we release an updated version of VisualWebArena, featuring improved evaluators, high-fidelity environment parallelism with >10x speedups, and VWA-Lite, a 1/3-scale subset with comparable evaluation fidelity.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗