← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2602.00282 · v2
Constrained Bilevel Reinforcement Learning via Approximate Lower-Level Responses
首次提交 2026-01-31 04:10
版本更新 2026-11-12 10:54
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
摘要
We study constrained bilevel reinforcement learning in which the lower-level problem is a constrained Markov decision process with a generally parameterized policy. The lower-level solution map can be set-valued and need not be Lipschitz continuous in the upper-level variable, so standard hypergradient analyses do not apply. We therefore define the upper-level objective as the expected upper-level loss of the policy returned by a fixed stochastic lower-level algorithm, which we call the approximate response. This objective is well defined without uniqueness of the lower-level solution. To compute its gradient, we randomize the reward and constraint values used during lower-level training without changing their means, so that the upper-level variable affects training only through known probabilities. This yields an unbiased estimator of the upper-level objective's gradient that does not differentiate through the lower-level updates. We establish lower-level reward and feasibility guarantees, upper-level stationarity, and a total sample complexity of over both levels, where is the lower-level accuracy and is the upper-level stationarity error. Setting gives .
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v2 · 2026-11-12 10:54 · 最新观测版本
Constrained Bilevel Reinforcement Learning via Approximate Lower-Level Responses
We study constrained bilevel reinforcement learning in which the lower-level problem is a constrained Markov decision process with a generally parameterized policy. The lower-level solution map can be set-valued and need not be Lipschitz continuous in the upper-level variable, so standard hypergradient analyses do not apply. We therefore define the upper-level objective as the expected upper-level loss of the policy returned by a fixed stochastic lower-level algorithm, which we call the approximate response. This objective is well defined without uniqueness of the lower-level solution. To compute its gradient, we randomize the reward and constraint values used during lower-level training without changing their means, so that the upper-level variable affects training only through known probabilities. This yields an unbiased estimator of the upper-level objective's gradient that does not differentiate through the lower-level updates. We establish lower-level reward and feasibility guarantees, upper-level stationarity, and a total sample complexity of over both levels, where is the lower-level accuracy and is the upper-level stationarity error. Setting gives .
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗