跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2602.00282 · v2

Constrained Bilevel Reinforcement Learning via Approximate Lower-Level Responses

首次提交 2026-01-31 04:10
版本更新 2026-11-12 10:54
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We study constrained bilevel reinforcement learning in which the lower-level problem is a constrained Markov decision process with a generally parameterized policy. The lower-level solution map can be set-valued and need not be Lipschitz continuous in the upper-level variable, so standard hypergradient analyses do not apply. We therefore define the upper-level objective as the expected upper-level loss of the policy returned by a fixed stochastic lower-level algorithm, which we call the approximate response. This objective is well defined without uniqueness of the lower-level solution. To compute its gradient, we randomize the reward and constraint values used during lower-level training without changing their means, so that the upper-level variable affects training only through known probabilities. This yields an unbiased estimator of the upper-level objective's gradient that does not differentiate through the lower-level updates. We establish lower-level reward and feasibility guarantees, upper-level stationarity, and a total sample complexity of O~(δℓ−6εo−2)\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(δ_\ell^{-6}ε_o^{-2}) over both levels, where δℓδ_\ell is the lower-level accuracy and εoε_o is the upper-level stationarity error. Setting δℓ=εo=εδ_\ell=ε_o=ε gives O~(ε−8)\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(ε^{-8}).

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v2,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-12 10:54 · 最新观测版本

Constrained Bilevel Reinforcement Learning via Approximate Lower-Level Responses

We study constrained bilevel reinforcement learning in which the lower-level problem is a constrained Markov decision process with a generally parameterized policy. The lower-level solution map can be set-valued and need not be Lipschitz continuous in the upper-level variable, so standard hypergradient analyses do not apply. We therefore define the upper-level objective as the expected upper-level loss of the policy returned by a fixed stochastic lower-level algorithm, which we call the approximate response. This objective is well defined without uniqueness of the lower-level solution. To compute its gradient, we randomize the reward and constraint values used during lower-level training without changing their means, so that the upper-level variable affects training only through known probabilities. This yields an unbiased estimator of the upper-level objective's gradient that does not differentiate through the lower-level updates. We establish lower-level reward and feasibility guarantees, upper-level stationarity, and a total sample complexity of O~(δℓ−6εo−2)\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(δ_\ell^{-6}ε_o^{-2}) over both levels, where δℓδ_\ell is the lower-level accuracy and εoε_o is the upper-level stationarity error. Setting δℓ=εo=εδ_\ell=ε_o=ε gives O~(ε−8)\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(ε^{-8}).

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗