跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2602.03894 · v2

Vision Transformers for Zero-Shot Clustering of Animal Images: A Comparative Benchmarking Study

首次提交 2026-02-03 16:27
版本更新 2026-11-09 16:10
雷达观测 2026-11-10 13:18
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Manual labelling of animal images remains a significant bottleneck in ecological research, limiting the scale and efficiency of biodiversity monitoring efforts. This study investigates whether state-of-the-art Vision Transformer (ViT) foundation models can reduce thousands of unlabelled animal images directly to species-level clusters. We present a comprehensive benchmarking framework evaluating five ViT models combined with five dimensionality reduction techniques and four clustering algorithms, two supervised and two unsupervised, across 60 species (30 mammals and 30 birds), with each test using a random subset of 200 validated images per species. We investigate when clustering succeeds at species-level, where it fails, and whether clustering within the species-level reveals ecologically meaningful patterns such as sex, age, or phenotypic variation. Our primary, fully unsupervised finding is that DINOv3 embeddings with t-SNE and HDBSCAN reach a species-level V-measure of 0.943 with no prior knowledge of the number of species, rejecting only 1.14% of images as outliers requiring expert review. Assigning one label per cluster reduces manual labelling actions by 98.3%, with 94.6% of clustered images labelled correctly, close to the accuracy of manual annotation. When the true number of species is supplied, supervised hierarchical clustering raises this to 0.958, which we report as an upper bound as the species count is typically unknown in real deployments. We further demonstrate robustness to realistic long-tailed distributions of species and show that intentional over-clustering can reveal intra-specific variation including age classes, sexual dimorphism, and pelage differences. We introduce an open-source benchmarking toolkit and provide recommendations for ecologists to select appropriate methods for sorting their specific taxonomic groups and data.

作者备注:Published version (open access, CC BY 4.0): IET Computer Vision 20(1), e70091 (2026)

期刊信息:IET Computer Vision 20(1), e70091 (2026)

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v2,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-09 16:10 · 最新观测版本

Vision Transformers for Zero-Shot Clustering of Animal Images: A Comparative Benchmarking Study

Manual labelling of animal images remains a significant bottleneck in ecological research, limiting the scale and efficiency of biodiversity monitoring efforts. This study investigates whether state-of-the-art Vision Transformer (ViT) foundation models can reduce thousands of unlabelled animal images directly to species-level clusters. We present a comprehensive benchmarking framework evaluating five ViT models combined with five dimensionality reduction techniques and four clustering algorithms, two supervised and two unsupervised, across 60 species (30 mammals and 30 birds), with each test using a random subset of 200 validated images per species. We investigate when clustering succeeds at species-level, where it fails, and whether clustering within the species-level reveals ecologically meaningful patterns such as sex, age, or phenotypic variation. Our primary, fully unsupervised finding is that DINOv3 embeddings with t-SNE and HDBSCAN reach a species-level V-measure of 0.943 with no prior knowledge of the number of species, rejecting only 1.14% of images as outliers requiring expert review. Assigning one label per cluster reduces manual labelling actions by 98.3%, with 94.6% of clustered images labelled correctly, close to the accuracy of manual annotation. When the true number of species is supplied, supervised hierarchical clustering raises this to 0.958, which we report as an upper bound as the species count is typically unknown in real deployments. We further demonstrate robustness to realistic long-tailed distributions of species and show that intentional over-clustering can reveal intra-specific variation including age classes, sexual dimorphism, and pelage differences. We introduce an open-source benchmarking toolkit and provide recommendations for ecologists to select appropriate methods for sorting their specific taxonomic groups and data.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗