跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2604.07338 · v2

Appear2Meaning: A Cross-Cultural Benchmark for Structured Cultural Metadata Inference from Images

首次提交 2026-04-09 01:53
版本更新 2026-11-12 08:21
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Museum records express how people understand heritage objects through cultural and historical relations. Recovering these human attributions from images is a technical challenge for vision-language models (VLMs). We introduce Appear2Meaning, a cross-cultural benchmark of 750 museum objects for image-only recovery of title, culture, period, origin, and creator. Its evaluation framework distinguishes field-level from complete-record compatibility and uses human validation for semantic judgement. Across nine VLMs, mean field accuracy is 36.16--49.82%; 7.20--17.02% of records have all four contextual fields compatible, and 2.13--7.87% have all five, including title. For the two tested models, image-only input yields 12.6--32.2 percentage points higher reference compatibility for culture, period, and origin than a museum-and-title-only control.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-12 08:21 · 最新观测版本

Appear2Meaning: A Cross-Cultural Benchmark for Structured Cultural Metadata Inference from Images

Museum records express how people understand heritage objects through cultural and historical relations. Recovering these human attributions from images is a technical challenge for vision-language models (VLMs). We introduce Appear2Meaning, a cross-cultural benchmark of 750 museum objects for image-only recovery of title, culture, period, origin, and creator. Its evaluation framework distinguishes field-level from complete-record compatibility and uses human validation for semantic judgement. Across nine VLMs, mean field accuracy is 36.16--49.82%; 7.20--17.02% of records have all four contextual fields compatible, and 2.13--7.87% have all five, including title. For the two tested models, image-only input yields 12.6--32.2 percentage points higher reference compatibility for culture, period, and origin than a museum-and-title-only control.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗