跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2605.00913 · v2

Missingness-Conditioned Spatio-Temporal Fusion for Human Activity Recognition from Low-Quality Wearable Sensor Data

首次提交 2026-04-29 18:55
版本更新 2026-10-26 20:57
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:36
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Body-worn sensor networks capture human activities through complementary views, where nodes, modalities, and axes partially describe the underlying motion. In real deployments, hardware faults, wireless dropouts, and loose attachments often cause entire channels or nodes to go missing, while environmental interference degrades the remaining signals. The common impute-then-recognize pipeline introduces reconstruction errors that cannot be observed or corrected at inference. We propose the Missingness-Conditioned Spatio-Temporal Network (MCSTN), an end-to-end framework for robust activity recognition under imperfect sensing. MCSTN has three components: a structured imperfection generator that simulates point, temporal-block, axis, modality, and node failures, plus noise at varying signal-to-noise levels; a mask-aware representation that conditions node embeddings, attention, and temporal aggregation on the availability mask; and a complete-to-imperfect multi-view learning scheme where an exponential-moving-average teacher guides multiple degraded student views through semantic consistency. The encoder models temporal and cross-feature dependencies in parallel: a bi-directional selective state-space branch captures long-range temporal dependencies, a transposed-attention branch models cross-channel correlations, and adaptive weights fuse their outputs. At inference, the generator, teacher, and consistency loss are removed, so MCSTN predicts directly from the observed window and its mask without reconstruction or noise-level estimation. On PAMAP2, Opportunity, and WISDM, MCSTN achieves average macro-F1 scores of 94.24\%, 91.67\%, and 96.22\% under imperfect observations, the best among all compared methods on each dataset, and the best in every failure mode on Opportunity. It requires fewer than one million parameters, with 3.78~ms inference latency per sample.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-10-26 20:57 · 最新观测版本

Missingness-Conditioned Spatio-Temporal Fusion for Human Activity Recognition from Low-Quality Wearable Sensor Data

Body-worn sensor networks capture human activities through complementary views, where nodes, modalities, and axes partially describe the underlying motion. In real deployments, hardware faults, wireless dropouts, and loose attachments often cause entire channels or nodes to go missing, while environmental interference degrades the remaining signals. The common impute-then-recognize pipeline introduces reconstruction errors that cannot be observed or corrected at inference. We propose the Missingness-Conditioned Spatio-Temporal Network (MCSTN), an end-to-end framework for robust activity recognition under imperfect sensing. MCSTN has three components: a structured imperfection generator that simulates point, temporal-block, axis, modality, and node failures, plus noise at varying signal-to-noise levels; a mask-aware representation that conditions node embeddings, attention, and temporal aggregation on the availability mask; and a complete-to-imperfect multi-view learning scheme where an exponential-moving-average teacher guides multiple degraded student views through semantic consistency. The encoder models temporal and cross-feature dependencies in parallel: a bi-directional selective state-space branch captures long-range temporal dependencies, a transposed-attention branch models cross-channel correlations, and adaptive weights fuse their outputs. At inference, the generator, teacher, and consistency loss are removed, so MCSTN predicts directly from the observed window and its mask without reconstruction or noise-level estimation. On PAMAP2, Opportunity, and WISDM, MCSTN achieves average macro-F1 scores of 94.24\%, 91.67\%, and 96.22\% under imperfect observations, the best among all compared methods on each dataset, and the best in every failure mode on Opportunity. It requires fewer than one million parameters, with 3.78~ms inference latency per sample.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗