跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2605.13644 · v3

Learning Equilibria in Coordination Games via Minorization-Maximization

首次提交 2026-05-13 23:06
版本更新 2026-11-09 23:17
雷达观测 2026-11-10 15:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

This paper considers games where the utilities for agents are the sum of a term proportional to a social utility, and another term that is an individual cost or reward. The agents are assumed to be irrational in their perception of the individual cost or reward. The multi equilibrium game is regularized, and its strictly concave potential function is used to select a unique equilibrium. This selected equilibrium is shown to be an ε−ε-equilibrium of the original game, where εε is parametrized by the regularizing function. A minorization-maximization based iterative learning scheme is proposed to learn equilibria in this game. This scheme converges to the potential-optimal equilibrium, and has superior convergence behavior in comparison to gradient and best response methods.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v3,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v3 · 2026-11-09 23:17 · 最新观测版本

Learning Equilibria in Coordination Games via Minorization-Maximization

This paper considers games where the utilities for agents are the sum of a term proportional to a social utility, and another term that is an individual cost or reward. The agents are assumed to be irrational in their perception of the individual cost or reward. The multi equilibrium game is regularized, and its strictly concave potential function is used to select a unique equilibrium. This selected equilibrium is shown to be an ε−ε-equilibrium of the original game, where εε is parametrized by the regularizing function. A minorization-maximization based iterative learning scheme is proposed to learn equilibria in this game. This scheme converges to the potential-optimal equilibrium, and has superior convergence behavior in comparison to gradient and best response methods.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗