跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2605.14068 · v3

CurveBench: A Benchmark for Exact Topological Reasoning over Nested Jordan Curves

首次提交 2026-05-14 03:46
版本更新 2026-11-07 21:29
雷达观测 2026-11-10 11:14
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We introduce CurveBench, a benchmark for visual topological reasoning. Given an image of disjoint closed curves, a model must recover the tree of adjacent regions rooted at the exterior. The benchmark contains 756 hand-drawn images, ranging from simple configurations to maze-like and densely packed arrangements. Each image has a manually verified reference tree. We evaluate predictions by exact tree matching with the exterior root fixed. Gemini 3.1 Pro, the strongest model in our evaluation, achieves 71.1% exact-match accuracy on CurveBench-Easy and 28.7% on CurveBench-Hard. A Qwen3-VL-8B checkpoint trained using reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards reaches 31.7% on Easy, compared with 21.7% for its Thinking base model at a 16,384-token generation budget. The same comparison yields a gain of 1.1 percentage points on Hard.

作者备注:16 pages. Accepted as a poster at NeurIPS 2026 (Evaluations & Datasets Track). Updated evaluation protocol, results, and discussion

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v3 · 2026-11-07 21:29 · 最新观测版本

CurveBench: A Benchmark for Exact Topological Reasoning over Nested Jordan Curves

We introduce CurveBench, a benchmark for visual topological reasoning. Given an image of disjoint closed curves, a model must recover the tree of adjacent regions rooted at the exterior. The benchmark contains 756 hand-drawn images, ranging from simple configurations to maze-like and densely packed arrangements. Each image has a manually verified reference tree. We evaluate predictions by exact tree matching with the exterior root fixed. Gemini 3.1 Pro, the strongest model in our evaluation, achieves 71.1% exact-match accuracy on CurveBench-Easy and 28.7% on CurveBench-Hard. A Qwen3-VL-8B checkpoint trained using reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards reaches 31.7% on Easy, compared with 21.7% for its Thinking base model at a 16,384-token generation budget. The same comparison yields a gain of 1.1 percentage points on Hard.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗