跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2605.18483 · v2

Modality vs. Morphology: A Framework for Time Series Classification for Biological Signals

首次提交 2026-05-18 22:36
版本更新 2026-11-11 03:19
雷达观测 2026-11-13 11:12
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Techniques for classifying biological signals are largely developed within specific modalities rather than the underlying signal structure (i.e., morphology), leading to disjointed methodologies and limited guidance across diverse signals. This work introduces a novel morphology--modality framework that connects waveform structure to a principled design of preprocessing, feature extraction, and modeling techniques for biological time-series classification. We analyze evidence across biological signals including electroencephalography, electromyography, electrocardiography, photoplethysmography, and ocular modalities including electrooculography, pupillometry, and eye-tracking, and organize according to their primary morphologies: spikes, bursts, oscillations, slow drift, and hierarchical rhythms. Across these categories, we examine how morphology influences the analytical pipeline from preprocessing to modeling and evaluation. Localized architectures favor spikes and bursts, whereas frequency and temporal models capture oscillations, and hybrid approaches integrate local and global dependencies in hierarchical signals. The associations are not absolute as biological signals often contain multiple morphologies where relevance is task dependent. The proposed framework positions morphology as an inductive biases are useful for modeling. We further identify challenges in cross-subject generalization, morphology-preserving data augmentation, multimodal fusion, and evaluation practices. By linking modality-specific constraints with waveform structure, this review provides guidance for selecting and evaluating pipelines across biological signals. We argue that morphology provides a useful cross-modal lens for developing biological time-series classification systems that are more generalizable, interpretable, and physiologically grounded.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v2,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-11 03:19 · 最新观测版本

Modality vs. Morphology: A Framework for Time Series Classification for Biological Signals

Techniques for classifying biological signals are largely developed within specific modalities rather than the underlying signal structure (i.e., morphology), leading to disjointed methodologies and limited guidance across diverse signals. This work introduces a novel morphology--modality framework that connects waveform structure to a principled design of preprocessing, feature extraction, and modeling techniques for biological time-series classification. We analyze evidence across biological signals including electroencephalography, electromyography, electrocardiography, photoplethysmography, and ocular modalities including electrooculography, pupillometry, and eye-tracking, and organize according to their primary morphologies: spikes, bursts, oscillations, slow drift, and hierarchical rhythms. Across these categories, we examine how morphology influences the analytical pipeline from preprocessing to modeling and evaluation. Localized architectures favor spikes and bursts, whereas frequency and temporal models capture oscillations, and hybrid approaches integrate local and global dependencies in hierarchical signals. The associations are not absolute as biological signals often contain multiple morphologies where relevance is task dependent. The proposed framework positions morphology as an inductive biases are useful for modeling. We further identify challenges in cross-subject generalization, morphology-preserving data augmentation, multimodal fusion, and evaluation practices. By linking modality-specific constraints with waveform structure, this review provides guidance for selecting and evaluating pipelines across biological signals. We argue that morphology provides a useful cross-modal lens for developing biological time-series classification systems that are more generalizable, interpretable, and physiologically grounded.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗