跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2607.21776 · v2

PulseGuard: rPPG-Derived Temporal Signals as a Forensic Modality for Talking-Face Deepfake Detection

首次提交 2026-07-24 03:47
版本更新 2026-11-11 14:09
雷达观测 2026-11-13 11:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Talking-face (TF) deepfake generation synthesizes photorealistic facial video from a static source image and an audio signal, producing forgeries that current image-based detectors consistently fail to identify. Unlike face-swap manipulation, TF synthesis has no underlying real video from which to inherit physiological characteristics, motivating remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) as a detection modality for this forgery category. We propose PulseGuard, a detection framework that extracts per-window rPPG waveforms via RhythmFormer and trains a suite of lightweight classifiers to distinguish real from synthesized traces. Evaluated on the TF subset of Celeb-DF++ under a strict subject-independent protocol, where test identities are completely separated from training identities, our 1D ResNet achieves a window-level AUC of 0.826 at EER 25.1% (0.842 pooled to video level, the granularity at which DeepFakesON-Phys is scored) while operating exclusively on the extracted temporal signal, and retains AUC 0.754 on generators withheld entirely from training. We document a controlled reproduction study of DeepFakesON-Phys, the representative prior rPPG detector, demonstrating degradation from AUC 0.999 on legacy face-swap data to 0.576 on the TF subset of Celeb-DF++. We further show that detection difficulty is strongly method-dependent: AUC ranges from 0.937 (Real3DPortrait) to 0.617 (IP-LAP) across the seven TF generators, with the ordering broadly preserved under per-method training. This spread is stable across training regimes rather than reflecting evaluation noise, and constitutes the primary empirical contribution of the work. We report these as empirical baselines and do not establish that the discriminative content is cardiac in origin.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-11 14:09 · 最新观测版本

PulseGuard: rPPG-Derived Temporal Signals as a Forensic Modality for Talking-Face Deepfake Detection

Talking-face (TF) deepfake generation synthesizes photorealistic facial video from a static source image and an audio signal, producing forgeries that current image-based detectors consistently fail to identify. Unlike face-swap manipulation, TF synthesis has no underlying real video from which to inherit physiological characteristics, motivating remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) as a detection modality for this forgery category. We propose PulseGuard, a detection framework that extracts per-window rPPG waveforms via RhythmFormer and trains a suite of lightweight classifiers to distinguish real from synthesized traces. Evaluated on the TF subset of Celeb-DF++ under a strict subject-independent protocol, where test identities are completely separated from training identities, our 1D ResNet achieves a window-level AUC of 0.826 at EER 25.1% (0.842 pooled to video level, the granularity at which DeepFakesON-Phys is scored) while operating exclusively on the extracted temporal signal, and retains AUC 0.754 on generators withheld entirely from training. We document a controlled reproduction study of DeepFakesON-Phys, the representative prior rPPG detector, demonstrating degradation from AUC 0.999 on legacy face-swap data to 0.576 on the TF subset of Celeb-DF++. We further show that detection difficulty is strongly method-dependent: AUC ranges from 0.937 (Real3DPortrait) to 0.617 (IP-LAP) across the seven TF generators, with the ordering broadly preserved under per-method training. This spread is stable across training regimes rather than reflecting evaluation noise, and constitutes the primary empirical contribution of the work. We report these as empirical baselines and do not establish that the discriminative content is cardiac in origin.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗