跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2608.07555 · v2

You Don't Need To Stay in The Loop: An Agentic Robotics Loop for Robot-Policy Improvement

首次提交 2026-08-02 11:28
版本更新 2026-11-08 12:54
雷达观测 2026-11-10 12:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Coding agents close the software loop for training a robot policy without having a human in the loop: a main agent manages the training, subagents analyze and execute, treat robot policies and hardware as tools and do the work. We port this architecture to robot-policy improvement, where one difference dominates the design: robotic tools such as trained policies, training pipelines, and data collection fail routinely, so a tool's quality must be measured, recorded at every call, and expired when the artifact behind it changes. AgenticRobotics is a backend-independent control plane in which an LLM controller drives disposable workers through durable train--evaluate--improve transactions: an immutable objective, controller-owned measurement, commit-keyed crash recovery, an evidence-graded skill library, and a tool registry with a standardized, recorded call surface. The title is an operational claim, not a selection claim: the operator can leave because promotion is evidence-gated, state is recoverable, and capability quality is derived from records, not because the loop picks better checkpoints than a human. On the one lineage we measured, it does not. The gates provide measured false-promotion control (0.001 false promotions per run with the hardened margin, against 0.005--0.021 with the shipped rule), anytime-valid decisions under optional stopping, zero lost or duplicate effects under kill injection, and a signed verifier that caught six of six artifact-tampering classes.

作者备注:Agentic Robotics Preview Version

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-08 12:54 · 最新观测版本

You Don't Need To Stay in The Loop: An Agentic Robotics Loop for Robot-Policy Improvement

Coding agents close the software loop for training a robot policy without having a human in the loop: a main agent manages the training, subagents analyze and execute, treat robot policies and hardware as tools and do the work. We port this architecture to robot-policy improvement, where one difference dominates the design: robotic tools such as trained policies, training pipelines, and data collection fail routinely, so a tool's quality must be measured, recorded at every call, and expired when the artifact behind it changes. AgenticRobotics is a backend-independent control plane in which an LLM controller drives disposable workers through durable train--evaluate--improve transactions: an immutable objective, controller-owned measurement, commit-keyed crash recovery, an evidence-graded skill library, and a tool registry with a standardized, recorded call surface. The title is an operational claim, not a selection claim: the operator can leave because promotion is evidence-gated, state is recoverable, and capability quality is derived from records, not because the loop picks better checkpoints than a human. On the one lineage we measured, it does not. The gates provide measured false-promotion control (0.001 false promotions per run with the hardened margin, against 0.005--0.021 with the shipped rule), anytime-valid decisions under optional stopping, zero lost or duplicate effects under kill injection, and a signed verifier that caught six of six artifact-tampering classes.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗