跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2609.12841 · v2

A Graph-Based Approach for Mapping Kernel-Level Telemetry to MITRE ATT&CK

首次提交 2026-09-11 21:35
版本更新 2026-11-08 21:09
雷达观测 2026-11-10 12:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Mapping observed system behavior to standardized frameworks such as MITRE ATT&CK is essential for threat-informed defense. Existing automated methods mostly depend on Cyber Threat Intelligence reports, which offer only retrospective accounts of attacks. Kernel-level telemetry, i.e., system calls, instead provides first-hand evidence of adversary behavior, but its volume and complexity have limited its use for automated mapping. Its content also makes it unsuitable for cloud-based analysis: command lines carry credentials, events carry user identifiers and network endpoints, and during an incident the telemetry reveals which defenses failed. In this work, we present Trace2ATT&CK, a framework that maps kernel-level telemetry to ATT&CK techniques entirely within the defender's infrastructure. Trace2ATT&CK collects events via eBPF, reconstructs the attacker's activity as a process-centric provenance graph, and condenses it into a compact execution graph. This graph is classified by locally deployed open-weight LLMs, using either pure prompting or retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) grounded in the ATT&CK knowledge base, producing ranked technique candidates with supporting rationales. We evaluate Trace2ATT&CK on 347 Linux Atomic Red Team tests with seven open-weight LLMs. The best local configuration reaches an HR@5 of 66.57\% at the technique level. RAG improves over base prompting in every model and setting, by up to +15.44+15.44 percentage points, and the execution graph substantially outperforms raw telemetry while never exceeding the LLM context window. Finally, a frontier cloud model used as an upper-bound reference quantifies the cost of local inference at 24--28 percentage points. These results show that ATT&CK mapping from kernel-level telemetry is feasible without disclosing sensitive evidence to third-party services.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v2,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-08 21:09 · 最新观测版本

A Graph-Based Approach for Mapping Kernel-Level Telemetry to MITRE ATT&CK

Mapping observed system behavior to standardized frameworks such as MITRE ATT&CK is essential for threat-informed defense. Existing automated methods mostly depend on Cyber Threat Intelligence reports, which offer only retrospective accounts of attacks. Kernel-level telemetry, i.e., system calls, instead provides first-hand evidence of adversary behavior, but its volume and complexity have limited its use for automated mapping. Its content also makes it unsuitable for cloud-based analysis: command lines carry credentials, events carry user identifiers and network endpoints, and during an incident the telemetry reveals which defenses failed. In this work, we present Trace2ATT&CK, a framework that maps kernel-level telemetry to ATT&CK techniques entirely within the defender's infrastructure. Trace2ATT&CK collects events via eBPF, reconstructs the attacker's activity as a process-centric provenance graph, and condenses it into a compact execution graph. This graph is classified by locally deployed open-weight LLMs, using either pure prompting or retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) grounded in the ATT&CK knowledge base, producing ranked technique candidates with supporting rationales. We evaluate Trace2ATT&CK on 347 Linux Atomic Red Team tests with seven open-weight LLMs. The best local configuration reaches an HR@5 of 66.57\% at the technique level. RAG improves over base prompting in every model and setting, by up to +15.44+15.44 percentage points, and the execution graph substantially outperforms raw telemetry while never exceeding the LLM context window. Finally, a frontier cloud model used as an upper-bound reference quantifies the cost of local inference at 24--28 percentage points. These results show that ATT&CK mapping from kernel-level telemetry is feasible without disclosing sensitive evidence to third-party services.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗