跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.35344 · v1

Uncertainty-Guided Counterfactual Sensor Selection and Safety-Gated Recognition for Autonomous Sensing Agents in IoT Systems

首次提交 2026-10-26 20:35
版本更新 2026-10-26 20:35
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:36
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Autonomous IoT systems rely on distributed sensing, but sensor faults and communication loss can leave multichannel evidence incomplete or unreliable. Their agents must therefore classify measurements, assess evidence sufficiency, select a sensor to reacquire, and hand off unsafe decisions. We formulate counterfactual sensing: a degraded window defines the factual state, each candidate restoration defines a controlled alternative, and a pre-request utility model estimates loss reduction. Physics-Guided Invariant-Kinematic Fusion (PGIK-Fusion) constructs class evidence, while calibrated risk and cost-sensitive utility select acceptance, sensor request, or handoff from factual information. On the Logistic Activity Recognition Challenge dataset, PGIK-Fusion achieves 0.768 accuracy and a macro-averaged F1 score (Macro-F1) of 0.696, exceeding extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)--one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) fusion by 2.49 and 2.00 percentage points, respectively. Across seven predefined degradation conditions on held-out subjects, the policy reduces unsafe acceptance from 33.0% to 13.8%; relative to an action-rate-matched random policy, it raises automation accuracy by 18.5 percentage points and lowers expected cost by 24.7%. In the auxiliary within-event wind-turbine study, PGIK-Fusion reaches 0.975 Macro-F1, improves on XGBoost--1D-CNN by 1.17 percentage points, and reduces unsafe acceptance from 20.1% to 8.0%. The evaluation characterizes the controlled responses of a frozen recognition model to specified sensor restorations under predefined fault families and severities. Within this scope, the results demonstrate that calibrated recognition, targeted evidence acquisition, and conservative deferral can form a unified perception--action loop that reduces unsafe automation under sensor degradation.

作者备注:15 pages, 13 figures

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-10-26 20:35 · 最新观测版本

Uncertainty-Guided Counterfactual Sensor Selection and Safety-Gated Recognition for Autonomous Sensing Agents in IoT Systems

Autonomous IoT systems rely on distributed sensing, but sensor faults and communication loss can leave multichannel evidence incomplete or unreliable. Their agents must therefore classify measurements, assess evidence sufficiency, select a sensor to reacquire, and hand off unsafe decisions. We formulate counterfactual sensing: a degraded window defines the factual state, each candidate restoration defines a controlled alternative, and a pre-request utility model estimates loss reduction. Physics-Guided Invariant-Kinematic Fusion (PGIK-Fusion) constructs class evidence, while calibrated risk and cost-sensitive utility select acceptance, sensor request, or handoff from factual information. On the Logistic Activity Recognition Challenge dataset, PGIK-Fusion achieves 0.768 accuracy and a macro-averaged F1 score (Macro-F1) of 0.696, exceeding extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)--one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) fusion by 2.49 and 2.00 percentage points, respectively. Across seven predefined degradation conditions on held-out subjects, the policy reduces unsafe acceptance from 33.0% to 13.8%; relative to an action-rate-matched random policy, it raises automation accuracy by 18.5 percentage points and lowers expected cost by 24.7%. In the auxiliary within-event wind-turbine study, PGIK-Fusion reaches 0.975 Macro-F1, improves on XGBoost--1D-CNN by 1.17 percentage points, and reduces unsafe acceptance from 20.1% to 8.0%. The evaluation characterizes the controlled responses of a frozen recognition model to specified sensor restorations under predefined fault families and severities. Within this scope, the results demonstrate that calibrated recognition, targeted evidence acquisition, and conservative deferral can form a unified perception--action loop that reduces unsafe automation under sensor degradation.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗