← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2610.35403 · v1
NeSySpec: Neuro-Symbolic Technical Intelligence for Auditing Engineering Specifications with an Application to Aircraft
首次提交 2026-10-26 21:18
版本更新 2026-10-26 21:18
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:36
摘要
Engineers who audit a declared specification of an engineered system need to know which physical constraints it respects, which it violates, which field was altered and how to correct it. NeSySpec is an integrated and interpretable neuro-symbolic audit framework, built on Logic Tensor Networks, that answers these questions in one pipeline. Its axioms encode the physical relations of the domain as differentiable graded predicates whose tolerances are learned from a fleet of real records; from the same degrees, it diagnoses the violated constraint, identifies the altered field by abduction, proposes a minimum-change correction and ties image evidence to the parts it describes, abstaining exactly where evidence is missing, and returns all of it in one verification report. We validate NeSySpec on 107 aircraft types, with 16 test aircraft of 9 families held out of training, on specification records paired with ground photographs and satellite imagery and on synthetic errors: generated corruptions, edits labeled from the edit alone and deliberate falsifications. NeSySpec combines all the assessed audit outputs in one pipeline, which no learned, rule-based, solver-based, neuro-symbolic or language-model comparator does; on the test aircraft none is ahead of it in the macro-F1 of its constraint verdicts, in naming the violated constraint and the altered field or in the repair error, and it is competitive in record and image-pair detection. Its diagnosis names the violated constraint in 94.2% of corrupted test records, against 79.5% for classical Fellegi-Holt diagnosis, and on edits labeled from the edit alone, without retraining, abduction finds the altered field in 59.3% of records, against 30.6% for minimum-cardinality localization with random tie- breaking. Only the knowledge base, the visual predicates, the corruption generator and the data are specific to the domain.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-10-26 21:18 · 最新观测版本
NeSySpec: Neuro-Symbolic Technical Intelligence for Auditing Engineering Specifications with an Application to Aircraft
Engineers who audit a declared specification of an engineered system need to know which physical constraints it respects, which it violates, which field was altered and how to correct it. NeSySpec is an integrated and interpretable neuro-symbolic audit framework, built on Logic Tensor Networks, that answers these questions in one pipeline. Its axioms encode the physical relations of the domain as differentiable graded predicates whose tolerances are learned from a fleet of real records; from the same degrees, it diagnoses the violated constraint, identifies the altered field by abduction, proposes a minimum-change correction and ties image evidence to the parts it describes, abstaining exactly where evidence is missing, and returns all of it in one verification report. We validate NeSySpec on 107 aircraft types, with 16 test aircraft of 9 families held out of training, on specification records paired with ground photographs and satellite imagery and on synthetic errors: generated corruptions, edits labeled from the edit alone and deliberate falsifications. NeSySpec combines all the assessed audit outputs in one pipeline, which no learned, rule-based, solver-based, neuro-symbolic or language-model comparator does; on the test aircraft none is ahead of it in the macro-F1 of its constraint verdicts, in naming the violated constraint and the altered field or in the repair error, and it is competitive in record and image-pair detection. Its diagnosis names the violated constraint in 94.2% of corrupted test records, against 79.5% for classical Fellegi-Holt diagnosis, and on edits labeled from the edit alone, without retraining, abduction finds the altered field in 59.3% of records, against 30.6% for minimum-cardinality localization with random tie- breaking. Only the knowledge base, the visual predicates, the corruption generator and the data are specific to the domain.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗