← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2610.36765 · v1
Evaluation-Guided Demonstration Refinement for Vision-Language-Action Policies: The Winning Entry in the MetaFine Open Competition
首次提交 2026-10-27 15:21
版本更新 2026-10-27 15:21
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:35
摘要
We fine-tuned a separate $π_{0.5}$ policy for each of the five tasks in the MetaFine Open Competition, with a task-specific training mixture and number of actions executed per prediction. Training started from the official demonstrations and expert procedures. Local evaluation exposed recurring grasping, pushing, and insertion failures. We addressed them by revising the demonstrated motions and by adding expert continuations from states the policy reached, while keeping nominal demonstrations in training. Checkpoints were compared on every instruction, so that a gain on one instruction could not hide a loss on another. Our submission, MAI, ranked first overall with a score of 96.66.
作者备注：1st place in the MetaFine Open Competition, RoboFineMani Workshop @ CoRL 2026
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v2 · 2026-10-29 12:25 · 最新观测版本
Evaluation-Guided Demonstration Refinement for Vision-Language-Action Policies: The Winning Entry in the MetaFine Open Competition
We fine-tuned a separate $π_{0.5}$ policy for each of the five tasks in the MetaFine Open Competition, with a task-specific training mixture and number of actions executed per prediction. Training started from the official demonstrations and expert procedures. Local evaluation exposed recurring grasping, pushing, and insertion failures. We addressed them by revising the demonstrated motions and by adding expert continuations from states the policy reached, while keeping nominal demonstrations in training. Checkpoints were compared on every instruction, so that a gain on one instruction could not hide a loss on another. Our submission, MAI, ranked first overall with a score of 96.66.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗v1 · 2026-10-27 15:21
Evaluation-Guided Demonstration Refinement for Vision-Language-Action Policies: The Winning Entry in the MetaFine Open Competition
We fine-tuned a separate $π_{0.5}$ policy for each of the five tasks in the MetaFine Open Competition, with a task-specific training mixture and number of actions executed per prediction. Training started from the official demonstrations and expert procedures. Local evaluation exposed recurring grasping, pushing, and insertion failures. We addressed them by revising the demonstrated motions and by adding expert continuations from states the policy reached, while keeping nominal demonstrations in training. Checkpoints were compared on every instruction, so that a gain on one instruction could not hide a loss on another. Our submission, MAI, ranked first overall with a score of 96.66.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗