跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.38303 · v1

Don't Ask the LLM: Visual Token Pruning with Spectral Structure and Semantic Relevance

首次提交 2026-10-28 13:39
版本更新 2026-10-28 13:39
雷达观测 2026-10-30 10:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) represent images and videos as long visual-token sequences, substantially increasing inference costs. These costs motivate visual-token pruning, whose effectiveness depends on both what signal is used for selection and when that signal becomes available. Our analysis reveals complementary limitations: visual-side [CLS] attention produces scattered, background-biased selections under aggressive compression, while stronger query-conditioned signals become available after substantial computation within the large language model (LLM). This raises a natural question: can structurally coherent, query-aware token selection be performed before consulting the LLM? We therefore propose ST-Pruner (Spectral-Textual Pruner), a training-free framework for pre-LLM visual-token selection. It combines attention-independent spectral saliency with inverted patch-text similarity through parameter-free multiplicative fusion. Across diverse LVLMs, ST-Pruner retains over 95% of full-token performance using at most 11.1% of visual tokens and achieves a 3.2x end-to-end speedup on LLaVA-NeXT. Code is available at https://github.com/sejong-rcv/ST-Pruner.

作者备注:Accepted to WACV 2027. 19 pages (10 pages main paper, 9 pages supplementary material)

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-10-28 13:39 · 最新观测版本

Don't Ask the LLM: Visual Token Pruning with Spectral Structure and Semantic Relevance

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) represent images and videos as long visual-token sequences, substantially increasing inference costs. These costs motivate visual-token pruning, whose effectiveness depends on both what signal is used for selection and when that signal becomes available. Our analysis reveals complementary limitations: visual-side [CLS] attention produces scattered, background-biased selections under aggressive compression, while stronger query-conditioned signals become available after substantial computation within the large language model (LLM). This raises a natural question: can structurally coherent, query-aware token selection be performed before consulting the LLM? We therefore propose ST-Pruner (Spectral-Textual Pruner), a training-free framework for pre-LLM visual-token selection. It combines attention-independent spectral saliency with inverted patch-text similarity through parameter-free multiplicative fusion. Across diverse LVLMs, ST-Pruner retains over 95% of full-token performance using at most 11.1% of visual tokens and achieves a 3.2x end-to-end speedup on LLaVA-NeXT. Code is available at https://github.com/sejong-rcv/ST-Pruner.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗