跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.01323 · v1

Beyond Leaderless: Randomized Consensus Against Mobile Crashes

首次提交 2026-11-01 06:48
版本更新 2026-11-01 06:48
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:43
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Many consensus protocols fail to terminate under attack from an adversary that has the power to move between replicas and repeatedly crash one of them, even in synchrony. We present Multi-Leader Fixed-View Simplex (ML-FVS) to defend against such an adversary while keeping the simple structure and good-case latency of Simplex consensus. Our protocol extends fixed-view Simplex with multiple leaders, each of which may broadcast a proposal. At the voting deadline, each replica votes on the set of proposals it has seen so far. A hidden threshold beacon revealed after the votes gives a priority order on the multiple leaders, resolving each vote to its highest-priority proposal. Our model combines permanent adaptive Byzantine faults with mobile crashes. For a constant crash budget and $Δ$-delayed Byzantine corruption, we obtain $O(Δ)$ expected latency over repeated views whose leaders start honest. With immediate Byzantine corruptions, the protocol still achieves liveness. We also evaluate the protocol under random network delays and stochastic faults, finding that multiple leaders reduce view failures even when rational leaders delay their proposals to increase rewards.

作者备注:32 pages, 6 figures

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-01 06:48 · 最新观测版本

Beyond Leaderless: Randomized Consensus Against Mobile Crashes

Many consensus protocols fail to terminate under attack from an adversary that has the power to move between replicas and repeatedly crash one of them, even in synchrony. We present Multi-Leader Fixed-View Simplex (ML-FVS) to defend against such an adversary while keeping the simple structure and good-case latency of Simplex consensus. Our protocol extends fixed-view Simplex with multiple leaders, each of which may broadcast a proposal. At the voting deadline, each replica votes on the set of proposals it has seen so far. A hidden threshold beacon revealed after the votes gives a priority order on the multiple leaders, resolving each vote to its highest-priority proposal. Our model combines permanent adaptive Byzantine faults with mobile crashes. For a constant crash budget and $Δ$-delayed Byzantine corruption, we obtain $O(Δ)$ expected latency over repeated views whose leaders start honest. With immediate Byzantine corruptions, the protocol still achieves liveness. We also evaluate the protocol under random network delays and stochastic faults, finding that multiple leaders reduce view failures even when rational leaders delay their proposals to increase rewards.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗