跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.08785 · v1

Learning from How Users Interpret: Personalizing Recommendation Explanation Order

首次提交 2026-11-06 07:15
版本更新 2026-11-06 07:15
雷达观测 2026-11-09 10:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Personalized explanations typically adapt their content or presentation based on preferences, interaction histories, or other user characteristics. We examine whether regularities inferred from prior textual interpretations can support personalization of explanation organization. In a controlled within participant study with 122 participants, prior interpretations were represented along three dimensions: information selection, relative salience, and relational organization. The relational dimension was partially operationalized through co mobilization. These representations were aggregated into fixed historical profiles and used to organize otherwise identical explanation sentences. Participants encountered four organization procedures: the OWN historical profile, the DONOR historical profile, a population profile called POP, and a language model procedure using the historical profile called PROFILE LLM. Post exposure objective comprehension was the primary outcome. OWN achieved 86.5 percent correct responses, compared with 66.0 percent for DONOR, 63.9 percent for POP, and 73.0 percent for PROFILE LLM. Mixed effects analyses showed higher comprehension with OWN than with each alternative procedure. No reliable overall condition effect was detected for recommendation acceptance. These findings indicate that historical profiles derived from prior interpretations can provide an actionable signal for personalizing explanation order while keeping explanatory content and wording fixed.

作者备注:Preprint

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-06 07:15 · 最新观测版本

Learning from How Users Interpret: Personalizing Recommendation Explanation Order

Personalized explanations typically adapt their content or presentation based on preferences, interaction histories, or other user characteristics. We examine whether regularities inferred from prior textual interpretations can support personalization of explanation organization. In a controlled within participant study with 122 participants, prior interpretations were represented along three dimensions: information selection, relative salience, and relational organization. The relational dimension was partially operationalized through co mobilization. These representations were aggregated into fixed historical profiles and used to organize otherwise identical explanation sentences. Participants encountered four organization procedures: the OWN historical profile, the DONOR historical profile, a population profile called POP, and a language model procedure using the historical profile called PROFILE LLM. Post exposure objective comprehension was the primary outcome. OWN achieved 86.5 percent correct responses, compared with 66.0 percent for DONOR, 63.9 percent for POP, and 73.0 percent for PROFILE LLM. Mixed effects analyses showed higher comprehension with OWN than with each alternative procedure. No reliable overall condition effect was detected for recommendation acceptance. These findings indicate that historical profiles derived from prior interpretations can provide an actionable signal for personalizing explanation order while keeping explanatory content and wording fixed.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗