跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.09799 · v1

On the Order of Privacy and Smoothing in Functional Mean Estimation

函数均值估计中隐私与平滑的次序问题

首次提交 2026-11-07 01:53
版本更新 2026-11-07 01:53
雷达观测 2026-11-09 13:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Differential privacy (DP) is a leading framework for privacy protection, yet privacy mechanisms tailored to functional data analysis (FDA) remain relatively underexplored. For functional mean estimation, we investigate a fundamental question regarding the ordering of privatization and estimation by comparing two canonical pipelines: Fit-Then-Protect (FTP), which smooths trajectories before privatization, and Protect-Then-Fit (PTF), which privatizes observations at discrete time points before smoothing. When data are observed without error, we prove that FTP achieves strictly smaller mean squared error than PTF asymptotically (as the sample size increases) under the same μμ-Gaussian differential privacy (μμ-GDP) budget in both finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces and infinite-dimensional reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS). Simulation studies support our theory and explore settings with observation error and fitting constraints, demonstrating that FTP outperforms PTF under small observation noise, whereas PTF can become preferable in high-noise settings. In addition to this comparison, we establish a novel GDP guarantee for Gaussian perturbations taking values in a Banach space, extending existing results beyond the RKHS setting.

作者备注:45 pages, 6 figures, 1 table

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

在函数均值估计中比较“先平滑后加隐私”与“先加隐私后平滑”两种流程的均方误差,并给出Banach空间下高斯扰动的GDP保证。

正在读取账号与研究记录…

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-07 01:53 · 最新观测版本

On the Order of Privacy and Smoothing in Functional Mean Estimation

Differential privacy (DP) is a leading framework for privacy protection, yet privacy mechanisms tailored to functional data analysis (FDA) remain relatively underexplored. For functional mean estimation, we investigate a fundamental question regarding the ordering of privatization and estimation by comparing two canonical pipelines: Fit-Then-Protect (FTP), which smooths trajectories before privatization, and Protect-Then-Fit (PTF), which privatizes observations at discrete time points before smoothing. When data are observed without error, we prove that FTP achieves strictly smaller mean squared error than PTF asymptotically (as the sample size increases) under the same μμ-Gaussian differential privacy (μμ-GDP) budget in both finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces and infinite-dimensional reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS). Simulation studies support our theory and explore settings with observation error and fitting constraints, demonstrating that FTP outperforms PTF under small observation noise, whereas PTF can become preferable in high-noise settings. In addition to this comparison, we establish a novel GDP guarantee for Gaussian perturbations taking values in a Banach space, extending existing results beyond the RKHS setting.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗