跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail
正在查看已观测的 v1。查看最新 v2 →

arXiv:2611.10292 · v1

Continual Instruction Tuning for LLM-ased Management of Continuum Resources

首次提交 2026-11-07 06:43
版本更新 2026-11-07 06:43
雷达观测 2026-11-10 10:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored for resource management across the Cloud-Edge continuum. However, embedding LLMs directly inside latency-sensitive control loops places inference latency, execution jitter, and hallucination risks on the critical path. This study argues for a different use of LLMs: a continually instruction-tuned intent compiler that runs once per management intent or declared context change, above a fast, deterministic tactical controller that handles all low-latency runtime actions. We formulate intent compilation as a continual instruction tuning problem, because management intents arrive sequentially and accumulate while infrastructure and workload contexts drift. Unlike recent LLM-based management frameworks, our design scores the model's outputs by execution, so that catastrophic forgetting can be measured in the executed objective of the underlying controller. On a continuum simulator with a 2B backbone and parameter-efficient adapters, preliminary results show that naive sequential tuning forgets earlier intents in the executed objective, that replay of stored examples nearly prevents this forgetting, and that the tuned compact compiler performs on par with simpler translators while being more robust than a grammar parser to rephrased intents.

作者备注:Accepted at the Workshop on Research and Innovation in Scalable and Efficient Deep Learning (RISE-DL 2026), co-located with the 16th International Conference on the Internet of Things (IoT 2026), Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, November 2026. The Version of Record will appear in the ACM proceedings of IoT 2026

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

仅对比实际观测的元数据,不代表 PDF 正文或实验变化。版本可能不连续;带删除线为移除,下划线为新增。

这两个版本的已观测标题、作者、分类、摘要和备注没有变化。正文是否变化请核对原文。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-10 19:46 · 最新观测版本

Continual Instruction Tuning for LLM-ased Management of Continuum Resources

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored for resource management across the Cloud-Edge continuum. However, embedding LLMs directly inside latency-sensitive control loops places inference latency, execution jitter, and hallucination risks on the critical path. This study argues for a different use of LLMs: a continually instruction-tuned intent compiler that runs once per management intent or declared context change, above a fast, deterministic tactical controller that handles all low-latency runtime actions. We formulate intent compilation as a continual instruction tuning problem, because management intents arrive sequentially and accumulate while infrastructure and workload contexts drift. Unlike recent LLM-based management frameworks, our design scores the model's outputs by execution, so that catastrophic forgetting can be measured in the executed objective of the underlying controller. On a continuum simulator with a 2B backbone and parameter-efficient adapters, preliminary results show that naive sequential tuning forgets earlier intents in the executed objective, that replay of stored examples nearly prevents this forgetting, and that the tuned compact compiler performs on par with simpler translators while being more robust than a grammar parser to rephrased intents.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗
v1 · 2026-11-07 06:43

Continual Instruction Tuning for LLM-ased Management of Continuum Resources

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored for resource management across the Cloud-Edge continuum. However, embedding LLMs directly inside latency-sensitive control loops places inference latency, execution jitter, and hallucination risks on the critical path. This study argues for a different use of LLMs: a continually instruction-tuned intent compiler that runs once per management intent or declared context change, above a fast, deterministic tactical controller that handles all low-latency runtime actions. We formulate intent compilation as a continual instruction tuning problem, because management intents arrive sequentially and accumulate while infrastructure and workload contexts drift. Unlike recent LLM-based management frameworks, our design scores the model's outputs by execution, so that catastrophic forgetting can be measured in the executed objective of the underlying controller. On a continuum simulator with a 2B backbone and parameter-efficient adapters, preliminary results show that naive sequential tuning forgets earlier intents in the executed objective, that replay of stored examples nearly prevents this forgetting, and that the tuned compact compiler performs on par with simpler translators while being more robust than a grammar parser to rephrased intents.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗