跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.10638 · v1

SLA-Aware Task Offloading in the IoT Edge-Cloud Continuum: Class-Weighted Deep Reinforcement Learning Against an Exact Optimum

首次提交 2026-11-07 18:26
版本更新 2026-11-07 18:26
雷达观测 2026-11-10 11:14
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Deep reinforcement learning (RL) is often used to decide where Internet of Things (IoT) tasks with different latency limits run in the edge-cloud continuum, yet some methods give every missed task the same penalty and few compare their agents with an optimal policy. This benchmark study builds four offloading systems small enough to solve exactly by dynamic programming and measures reward and learner against the optimum. A bonus for a met limit makes each miss cost its penalty plus the bonus, which shifts the class weights of published per-class rewards. A class-blind penalty stays 65% to 118% above the optimal cost even with a perfect learner, while a corrected per-class penalty comes within 0.13% of the optimum. With a per-class reward, tuned proximal policy optimization (PPO) agents come within 9% to 11% of the optimum in the smallest system, and the corrected one beats a tuned reservation rule in 9 of 10 seeds. In larger systems the agents stay 41% to 76% above the optimum, and a tuned rule beats their mean. Training ten times longer does not close this gap, and a PPO-Lagrangian agent with reachable targets does no better than the per-class reward.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-07 18:26 · 最新观测版本

SLA-Aware Task Offloading in the IoT Edge-Cloud Continuum: Class-Weighted Deep Reinforcement Learning Against an Exact Optimum

Deep reinforcement learning (RL) is often used to decide where Internet of Things (IoT) tasks with different latency limits run in the edge-cloud continuum, yet some methods give every missed task the same penalty and few compare their agents with an optimal policy. This benchmark study builds four offloading systems small enough to solve exactly by dynamic programming and measures reward and learner against the optimum. A bonus for a met limit makes each miss cost its penalty plus the bonus, which shifts the class weights of published per-class rewards. A class-blind penalty stays 65% to 118% above the optimal cost even with a perfect learner, while a corrected per-class penalty comes within 0.13% of the optimum. With a per-class reward, tuned proximal policy optimization (PPO) agents come within 9% to 11% of the optimum in the smallest system, and the corrected one beats a tuned reservation rule in 9 of 10 seeds. In larger systems the agents stay 41% to 76% above the optimum, and a tuned rule beats their mean. Training ten times longer does not close this gap, and a PPO-Lagrangian agent with reachable targets does no better than the per-class reward.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗