跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.10822 · v1

Learning When to Think: Adaptive Internal Computation for Reinforcement Learning

首次提交 2026-11-08 00:00
版本更新 2026-11-08 00:00
雷达观测 2026-11-10 11:14
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Iterative neural policies usually spend the same computation on every decision, although the benefit of additional processing varies across states. We introduce Adaptive Internal Computation (AIC), an iterative policy that learns when to stop refining its latent representation and act. In AIC, we train action selection and stopping jointly, an expected-depth penalty values computation and intermediate value predictions provide auxiliary supervision. We show that when only some states benefit from further refinement, an ideal state-dependent allocator outperforms every state-independent stopping schedule at the same expected depth. With at most eight refinement steps per decision, AIC executes 3.3 steps on average across twelve benchmark tasks and lowers per-decision latency by 31--44% relative to a fixed eight-step policy on four control and robotics tasks. Its mean reward exceeds the best fixed-depth policy on seven tasks and trails it on four. Ablating adaptive stopping and value supervision separately shows that stopping accounts for most of the reward gain on PickCube and AntMaze, where it also executes more refinement steps and that supervision accounts for most of it on RareEvent.

作者备注:Accepted at NeurIPS 2026

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-08 00:00 · 最新观测版本

Learning When to Think: Adaptive Internal Computation for Reinforcement Learning

Iterative neural policies usually spend the same computation on every decision, although the benefit of additional processing varies across states. We introduce Adaptive Internal Computation (AIC), an iterative policy that learns when to stop refining its latent representation and act. In AIC, we train action selection and stopping jointly, an expected-depth penalty values computation and intermediate value predictions provide auxiliary supervision. We show that when only some states benefit from further refinement, an ideal state-dependent allocator outperforms every state-independent stopping schedule at the same expected depth. With at most eight refinement steps per decision, AIC executes 3.3 steps on average across twelve benchmark tasks and lowers per-decision latency by 31--44% relative to a fixed eight-step policy on four control and robotics tasks. Its mean reward exceeds the best fixed-depth policy on seven tasks and trails it on four. Ablating adaptive stopping and value supervision separately shows that stopping accounts for most of the reward gain on PickCube and AntMaze, where it also executes more refinement steps and that supervision accounts for most of it on RareEvent.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗