跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.11688 · v1

Streaming Failure Forecasting: VLA Failure Monitors That Keep Learning After Deployment

首次提交 2026-11-09 07:17
版本更新 2026-11-09 07:17
雷达观测 2026-11-10 13:19
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Failure monitors for vision-language-action (VLA) policies are trained offline and then frozen. After deployment, lighting, objects and cameras drift, and the policy itself is updated or moved to new tasks. On recorded real-robot runs, after a switch of task or policy version, a frozen monitor fit on the old task ranks failures little better than chance. We present Streaming Failure Forecasting (SFF), a monitor that keeps learning from the one label every episode provides: whether it succeeded. SFF keeps the offline monitor's network fixed and refits only its last linear layer after each episode, at 2.18 ms per policy call on a Jetson CPU core. Its alarm threshold moves only after successes, which in simulation kept false alarms near target except when two drifts came at once. With every setting locked before testing, SFF ranks failures better than the same monitor kept frozen on 4 of 5 simulated test suites under unannounced drift, and above resetting on detected drift on every suite. Carried with its locked learner settings to 434 recorded runs of four VLAs on real SO-101 arms, replayed across unannounced switches of task or policy version, it ranks failures better than the frozen monitor for every VLA and, in an exploratory comparison, above a full reset at the true switch. A deployed failure monitor need not stay frozen: refitting its readout from outcomes is cheap and helps after the changes we tested.

作者备注:25 pages, 13 figures, 9 tables. A short version was accepted at the Sim2Real2Field and EEAI workshops at CoRL 2026. Project page: https://sff-research.org

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 07:17 · 最新观测版本

Streaming Failure Forecasting: VLA Failure Monitors That Keep Learning After Deployment

Failure monitors for vision-language-action (VLA) policies are trained offline and then frozen. After deployment, lighting, objects and cameras drift, and the policy itself is updated or moved to new tasks. On recorded real-robot runs, after a switch of task or policy version, a frozen monitor fit on the old task ranks failures little better than chance. We present Streaming Failure Forecasting (SFF), a monitor that keeps learning from the one label every episode provides: whether it succeeded. SFF keeps the offline monitor's network fixed and refits only its last linear layer after each episode, at 2.18 ms per policy call on a Jetson CPU core. Its alarm threshold moves only after successes, which in simulation kept false alarms near target except when two drifts came at once. With every setting locked before testing, SFF ranks failures better than the same monitor kept frozen on 4 of 5 simulated test suites under unannounced drift, and above resetting on detected drift on every suite. Carried with its locked learner settings to 434 recorded runs of four VLAs on real SO-101 arms, replayed across unannounced switches of task or policy version, it ranks failures better than the frozen monitor for every VLA and, in an exploratory comparison, above a full reset at the true switch. A deployed failure monitor need not stay frozen: refitting its readout from outcomes is cheap and helps after the changes we tested.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗