跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.11734 · v1

A Bifurcation-Theoretic Framework for the Controllability of Emergent Intelligent Systems

首次提交 2026-11-09 09:18
版本更新 2026-11-09 09:18
雷达观测 2026-11-10 13:18
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Real-world intelligent systems must reconcile two demands: the adaptability conferred by emergence and the steerability required for accountable deployment. We show that these demands are governed by two distinct bifurcations on the same object and that, consequently, increased capability does not imply increased controllability. Emergence is a bifurcation of the capability variable SS, with criterion Γ:=F′(0)>1Γ:=\mathcal F'(0)>1 equivalent to the existence of a unique positive stable fixed point of a self-consistency equation, following solely from the concavity of F\mathcal F. Controllability is a bifurcation of the permission variable cc, whose dynamics include an erosion term and exhibit a saddle-node fold with hysteresis as the gate criterion ρ∗ρ^\ast crosses unity. Three quantitative results follow: the critical exponent distinguishes families rather than classifying the transition; the gating-cost bound K(M)∝log⁡(1+M)K(M)\propto\log(1+M) grows with scope, not capability; and the fold threshold is γc≈4μκγ_c\approx4μκ. Calibrated in both directions, the criteria reproduce the two-dimensional Ising transition, admit two true-feedback order parameters, and reject nine candidate quantities, supporting the conclusion that the order parameter is geometric rather than capability-related. Since permission cannot be endogenized and no deployed system has been measured to satisfy Γ>1Γ>1 and ρ∗>1ρ^\ast>1 simultaneously, increased capability does not imply controllability.

作者备注:21 pages, 1 figure, 5 tables

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 09:18 · 最新观测版本

A Bifurcation-Theoretic Framework for the Controllability of Emergent Intelligent Systems

Real-world intelligent systems must reconcile two demands: the adaptability conferred by emergence and the steerability required for accountable deployment. We show that these demands are governed by two distinct bifurcations on the same object and that, consequently, increased capability does not imply increased controllability. Emergence is a bifurcation of the capability variable SS, with criterion Γ:=F′(0)>1Γ:=\mathcal F'(0)>1 equivalent to the existence of a unique positive stable fixed point of a self-consistency equation, following solely from the concavity of F\mathcal F. Controllability is a bifurcation of the permission variable cc, whose dynamics include an erosion term and exhibit a saddle-node fold with hysteresis as the gate criterion ρ∗ρ^\ast crosses unity. Three quantitative results follow: the critical exponent distinguishes families rather than classifying the transition; the gating-cost bound K(M)∝log⁡(1+M)K(M)\propto\log(1+M) grows with scope, not capability; and the fold threshold is γc≈4μκγ_c\approx4μκ. Calibrated in both directions, the criteria reproduce the two-dimensional Ising transition, admit two true-feedback order parameters, and reject nine candidate quantities, supporting the conclusion that the order parameter is geometric rather than capability-related. Since permission cannot be endogenized and no deployed system has been measured to satisfy Γ>1Γ>1 and ρ∗>1ρ^\ast>1 simultaneously, increased capability does not imply controllability.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗