跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.11969 · v1

Executable Human Study Programs with Silicon Participants

首次提交 2026-11-09 14:51
版本更新 2026-11-09 14:51
雷达观测 2026-11-10 13:18
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We introduce HumanStudyProgram, a framework that represents a documented human study as an executable program with configurable LLM-based silicon participants. Its computational abstraction separates study logic from participant implementation through standardized APIs for presenting information and collecting responses. We implement a researcher-facing authoring tool that reconstructs source-linked study descriptions from papers and supplementary materials, supports researcher review, and generates executable HumanStudyProgram artifacts. Researchers can then configure silicon participants, run the programs, and analyze results from aggregate findings to individual responses. We demonstrate the approach through study cases and evaluate the tool through a hands-on expert review with 12 social science researchers. All completed the workflow and identified potential uses in understanding published protocols, prototyping studies, and examining AI behavior. We aim to improve the reproducibility of human studies by reconstructing their documented procedures as programs that others can reuse and build upon.

作者备注:15 pages, 12 figures, 8 tables

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 14:51 · 最新观测版本

Executable Human Study Programs with Silicon Participants

We introduce HumanStudyProgram, a framework that represents a documented human study as an executable program with configurable LLM-based silicon participants. Its computational abstraction separates study logic from participant implementation through standardized APIs for presenting information and collecting responses. We implement a researcher-facing authoring tool that reconstructs source-linked study descriptions from papers and supplementary materials, supports researcher review, and generates executable HumanStudyProgram artifacts. Researchers can then configure silicon participants, run the programs, and analyze results from aggregate findings to individual responses. We demonstrate the approach through study cases and evaluate the tool through a hands-on expert review with 12 social science researchers. All completed the workflow and identified potential uses in understanding published protocols, prototyping studies, and examining AI behavior. We aim to improve the reproducibility of human studies by reconstructing their documented procedures as programs that others can reuse and build upon.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗