← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.12657 · v2
When Does Sliced Inference Pay Off? Resolution, Tiling and Dense Fusion for Small Object Detection
首次提交 2026-11-10 00:25
版本更新 2026-11-10 15:50
雷达观测 2026-11-11 13:08
摘要
Sliced inference such as SAHI is the standard remedy for small objects in high-resolution imagery, but its gains are usually measured against low-resolution baselines. We revisit sliced inference with scale as the explicit variable and ask when tiling actually pays off. We compare seven dense detectors from four families on VisDrone and DOTA, under pre-specified hypotheses, calibration-only tuning and a single evaluation on held-out test data. Two findings emerge. First, much of the benefit attributed to slicing is a resolution effect: on VisDrone, a single pass trained at a higher resolution outperforms tiling with box fusion (merging decoded boxes) for every detector that could be trained at that resolution, and at equal compute a higher resolution helps more than a larger model. Second, tiles carry complementary information that box fusion wastes. We introduce SCAHI (Slicing with Coverage-Aware Hyper Inference), which accumulates the dense outputs of all passes with weights that give every image position the same total coverage, and reads objects off a peak grid fine enough to keep crowded neighbours apart. On identical passes, SCAHI outperforms box fusion for every YOLO detector on both datasets and matches it for FCOS. On DOTA, whose images far exceed the resolution a single pass can be trained at, tiles with SCAHI beat the best single pass for every detector, by 4.3 to 5.6 mAP50 at 2048 px, and replacing only SAHI's merge step by SCAHI adds 2.3 to 4.0 mAP50. An ablation attributes the gain to the border weighting and the resolution of the peak grid. Source code is available at https://github.com/beckerio/scahi.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v2 · 2026-11-10 15:50 · 最新观测版本
When Does Sliced Inference Pay Off? Resolution, Tiling and Dense Fusion for Small Object Detection
Sliced inference such as SAHI is the standard remedy for small objects in high-resolution imagery, but its gains are usually measured against low-resolution baselines. We revisit sliced inference with scale as the explicit variable and ask when tiling actually pays off. We compare seven dense detectors from four families on VisDrone and DOTA, under pre-specified hypotheses, calibration-only tuning and a single evaluation on held-out test data. Two findings emerge. First, much of the benefit attributed to slicing is a resolution effect: on VisDrone, a single pass trained at a higher resolution outperforms tiling with box fusion (merging decoded boxes) for every detector that could be trained at that resolution, and at equal compute a higher resolution helps more than a larger model. Second, tiles carry complementary information that box fusion wastes. We introduce SCAHI (Slicing with Coverage-Aware Hyper Inference), which accumulates the dense outputs of all passes with weights that give every image position the same total coverage, and reads objects off a peak grid fine enough to keep crowded neighbours apart. On identical passes, SCAHI outperforms box fusion for every YOLO detector on both datasets and matches it for FCOS. On DOTA, whose images far exceed the resolution a single pass can be trained at, tiles with SCAHI beat the best single pass for every detector, by 4.3 to 5.6 mAP50 at 2048 px, and replacing only SAHI's merge step by SCAHI adds 2.3 to 4.0 mAP50. An ablation attributes the gain to the border weighting and the resolution of the peak grid. Source code is available at https://github.com/beckerio/scahi.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗v1 · 2026-11-10 00:25
When Does Sliced Inference Pay Off? Resolution, Tiling and Dense Fusion for Small Object Detection
Sliced inference such as SAHI is the standard remedy for small objects in high-resolution imagery, but its gains are usually measured against low-resolution baselines. We revisit sliced inference with scale as the explicit variable and ask when tiling actually pays off. We compare seven dense detectors from four families on VisDrone and DOTA, under pre-specified hypotheses, calibration-only tuning and a single evaluation on held-out test data. Two findings emerge. First, much of the benefit attributed to slicing is a resolution effect: on VisDrone, a single pass trained at a higher resolution outperforms tiling with box fusion (merging decoded boxes) for every detector that could be trained at that resolution, and at equal compute a higher resolution helps more than a larger model. Second, tiles carry complementary information that box fusion wastes. We introduce SCAHI (Slicing with Coverage-Aware Hyper Inference), which accumulates the dense outputs of all passes with weights that give every image position the same total coverage, and reads objects off a peak grid fine enough to keep crowded neighbours apart. On identical passes, SCAHI outperforms box fusion for every YOLO detector on both datasets and matches it for FCOS. On DOTA, whose images far exceed the resolution a single pass can be trained at, tiles with SCAHI beat the best single pass for every detector, by 4.3 to 5.6 mAP50 at 2048 px, and replacing only SAHI's merge step by SCAHI adds 2.3 to 4.0 mAP50. An ablation attributes the gain to the border weighting and the resolution of the peak grid. Source code is available at https://github.com/beckerio/scahi.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗