跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.13009 · v1

Instance-preserving graded semantic reporting for surgical action triplets

首次提交 2026-11-09 09:39
版本更新 2026-11-09 09:39
雷达观测 2026-11-11 11:05
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Complete-or-reject reporting of surgical action triplets can discard a correctly identified instrument and action when the target is uncertain. We introduce instance-preserving graded semantic reporting, which separates instance selection from the choice of semantic detail. Each selected instance retains its predicted mask and labels while hierarchical correctness scores guide instrument (I), instrument-verb (IV), or complete instrument-verb-target (IVT) reporting. The utility-increment rule DELTA weighs the expected gain from finer reporting against its error cost. We compare three decision rules on 5,641 test frames from eight surgical videos using fixed predictions and scores. At the 10% development calibration target, DELTA retains correct partial reports for 80.0% of candidates rejected by a matched complete-or-reject baseline (5,329/6,662). Adding IV increases source-normalized weighted correct-report yield by 19.13 to 23.13 per 100 frames across all three rules relative to separately recalibrated I/IVT controls. Weighted reporting risk changes by -0.77 to +1.01 percentage points, with complete correct-triplet counts unchanged or reduced. Graded reporting makes partial surgical predictions available as localized descriptions, with an explicit trade-off between report utility and completeness.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 09:39 · 最新观测版本

Instance-preserving graded semantic reporting for surgical action triplets

Complete-or-reject reporting of surgical action triplets can discard a correctly identified instrument and action when the target is uncertain. We introduce instance-preserving graded semantic reporting, which separates instance selection from the choice of semantic detail. Each selected instance retains its predicted mask and labels while hierarchical correctness scores guide instrument (I), instrument-verb (IV), or complete instrument-verb-target (IVT) reporting. The utility-increment rule DELTA weighs the expected gain from finer reporting against its error cost. We compare three decision rules on 5,641 test frames from eight surgical videos using fixed predictions and scores. At the 10% development calibration target, DELTA retains correct partial reports for 80.0% of candidates rejected by a matched complete-or-reject baseline (5,329/6,662). Adding IV increases source-normalized weighted correct-report yield by 19.13 to 23.13 per 100 frames across all three rules relative to separately recalibrated I/IVT controls. Weighted reporting risk changes by -0.77 to +1.01 percentage points, with complete correct-triplet counts unchanged or reduced. Graded reporting makes partial surgical predictions available as localized descriptions, with an explicit trade-off between report utility and completeness.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗