跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.13398 · v1

The Dose Makes the Poison: Exposure-Aware Evaluation of Generative Drug Design

首次提交 2026-11-10 08:20
版本更新 2026-11-10 08:20
雷达观测 2026-11-11 11:04
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Generative models are increasingly used to propose molecules for drug discovery. They can produce far more candidates than can be experimentally tested, making computational selection essential. Most selection methods rely on predicted molecular properties, such as potency and toxicity, but overlook how these properties translate into drug exposure at a given dose. As a result, molecules that appear promising on paper may require impractical doses or raise safety concerns. We investigate this gap by using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) simulations to re-evaluate molecules selected from three PARP1-targeted generative pipelines. Of 60 shortlisted molecules, seven fail to achieve sufficient target exposure, while 28% of the remaining candidates show predicted safety risks at their required dose. Moreover, 85% of candidates with an achievable dose are outperformed by molecules overlooked during static selection. These findings suggest that accounting for dose and exposure can substantially change which generated molecules are considered promising for drug development.

作者备注:14 pages, 3 figures. Accepted at the AI4DD workshop (AI for Drug Discovery: Bridging the Translation Gap), NeurIPS 2026

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-10 08:20 · 最新观测版本

The Dose Makes the Poison: Exposure-Aware Evaluation of Generative Drug Design

Generative models are increasingly used to propose molecules for drug discovery. They can produce far more candidates than can be experimentally tested, making computational selection essential. Most selection methods rely on predicted molecular properties, such as potency and toxicity, but overlook how these properties translate into drug exposure at a given dose. As a result, molecules that appear promising on paper may require impractical doses or raise safety concerns. We investigate this gap by using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) simulations to re-evaluate molecules selected from three PARP1-targeted generative pipelines. Of 60 shortlisted molecules, seven fail to achieve sufficient target exposure, while 28% of the remaining candidates show predicted safety risks at their required dose. Moreover, 85% of candidates with an achievable dose are outperformed by molecules overlooked during static selection. These findings suggest that accounting for dose and exposure can substantially change which generated molecules are considered promising for drug development.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗