跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.14850 · v1

Effective Teacher Support for Reasoning Distillation

首次提交 2026-11-11 08:00
版本更新 2026-11-11 08:00
雷达观测 2026-11-13 10:09
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Forward-KL language-model distillation normally computes dense teacher and student scores over the full vocabulary at every supervised position, making training and stored teacher targets expensive. We instead distill from the teacher's highest-probability vocabulary fraction, renormalizing the retained mass as we sweep support from 100% to 0.01%. Our main study distills Qwen3 4B -> 1.7B. We confirm the broader support-reduction finding on larger Qwen3 8B -> 4B and Nemotron Nano 12B -> 9B pairs and under answer-only supervision. We evaluate generation primarily on MMLU-Pro and secondarily on GPQA-Diamond. Across the Qwen3 settings, retaining 0.01% of the vocabulary causes no observed MMLU-Pro degradation relative to full-vocabulary distillation, although disagreement with the complete teacher distribution increases. Nemotron Nano matches full-vocabulary MMLU-Pro at 0.1%, but smaller fractions fail to emit the closing reasoning tag, showing that the reliable cutoff depends on the model family. At 0.01% support, caching the retained next-token scores from the teacher forward pass cuts training step time by 38%, while restricting student output computation to those tokens cuts peak memory by 24%; neither causes observed MMLU-Pro degradation.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-11 08:00 · 最新观测版本

Effective Teacher Support for Reasoning Distillation

Forward-KL language-model distillation normally computes dense teacher and student scores over the full vocabulary at every supervised position, making training and stored teacher targets expensive. We instead distill from the teacher's highest-probability vocabulary fraction, renormalizing the retained mass as we sweep support from 100% to 0.01%. Our main study distills Qwen3 4B -> 1.7B. We confirm the broader support-reduction finding on larger Qwen3 8B -> 4B and Nemotron Nano 12B -> 9B pairs and under answer-only supervision. We evaluate generation primarily on MMLU-Pro and secondarily on GPQA-Diamond. Across the Qwen3 settings, retaining 0.01% of the vocabulary causes no observed MMLU-Pro degradation relative to full-vocabulary distillation, although disagreement with the complete teacher distribution increases. Nemotron Nano matches full-vocabulary MMLU-Pro at 0.1%, but smaller fractions fail to emit the closing reasoning tag, showing that the reliable cutoff depends on the model family. At 0.01% support, caching the retained next-token scores from the teacher forward pass cuts training step time by 38%, while restricting student output computation to those tokens cuts peak memory by 24%; neither causes observed MMLU-Pro degradation.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗