跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15276 · v1

Verify by Doing: Co-Evolving Agent Execution and Evaluation without External Feedback

首次提交 2026-11-11 18:07
版本更新 2026-11-11 18:07
雷达观测 2026-11-13 11:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Agent self-improvement requires feedback about task success, yet external feedback may be unavailable at test time. Agents must then infer success from observable evidence, and incomplete verification can misguide subsequent updates. We introduce Verify by Doing (VbD), a method that co-evolves Actor and Evaluator harnesses within a single task while keeping model weights fixed. The Evaluator actively inspects artifacts and environment state with tools; its findings ground an internal signal for output selection and guide updates to both execution and verification procedures. Proposed Evaluators undergo comparative review on common candidates, while Actor updates require support from their own fresh outputs. Across AutomationBench, τ3τ^3 Banking, and selected GDPval tasks, VbD achieves the highest overall scores among the compared methods operating without external feedback, with gains of 3.3, 4.1, and 2.3 percentage points over the strongest baselines on the main backbone. Ablations support the contributions of active verification and Evaluator evolution, and selection from fixed candidate pools shows that improved verification can recover successful outputs without generating new ones.

作者备注:38 pages, including references and appendices

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-11 18:07 · 最新观测版本

Verify by Doing: Co-Evolving Agent Execution and Evaluation without External Feedback

Agent self-improvement requires feedback about task success, yet external feedback may be unavailable at test time. Agents must then infer success from observable evidence, and incomplete verification can misguide subsequent updates. We introduce Verify by Doing (VbD), a method that co-evolves Actor and Evaluator harnesses within a single task while keeping model weights fixed. The Evaluator actively inspects artifacts and environment state with tools; its findings ground an internal signal for output selection and guide updates to both execution and verification procedures. Proposed Evaluators undergo comparative review on common candidates, while Actor updates require support from their own fresh outputs. Across AutomationBench, τ3τ^3 Banking, and selected GDPval tasks, VbD achieves the highest overall scores among the compared methods operating without external feedback, with gains of 3.3, 4.1, and 2.3 percentage points over the strongest baselines on the main backbone. Ablations support the contributions of active verification and Evaluator evolution, and selection from fixed candidate pools shows that improved verification can recover successful outputs without generating new ones.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗