← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.15298 · v1
Quantum Recurrent Architectures for Financial Time Series Prediction
首次提交 2026-11-11 18:30
版本更新 2026-11-11 18:30
雷达观测 2026-11-13 11:11
摘要
This study evaluates quantum classical hybrid recurrent architectures for financial time-series forecasting: a Quantum Long Short-Term Memory (QLSTM) network and Quantum Reservoir Computing (QRC) with lag-based inputs. Classical lag vectors are encoded into quantum states via amplitude encoding, which compactly represents normalized observations but requires nontrivial state preparation; the QLSTM gates and the QRC reservoir are implemented with parameterized quantum circuits, while classical optimizers train the interface and readout layers. On a monthly revenue series extended to 1056 months by a Gaussian-process--hidden-Markov generator, with a fixed chronological 70/15/15 split and one-step-ahead forecasts, we compare both models against a full-size LSTM, a classical control matched in parameter budget and interface architecture, a small plain LSTM, and classical reservoir computing, over ten seeds and against persistence, seasonal-naive and SARIMA benchmark forecasts. The QLSTM, with 2,105 parameters, is statistically indistinguishable from an LSTM 126 times larger, but equally indistinguishable from the matched classical control and from a plain LSTM of the same budget, so its parameter efficiency cannot be attributed to the quantum circuits. The quantum reservoir is worse than a classical reservoir of equal feature dimension in all ten seeds and worse than SARIMA, whereas all recurrent models and both classical reservoirs improve on SARIMA by about 2\% in RMSE. In a 24-month rolling-origin backtest the classical LSTMs degrade more slowly than the QLSTM. We find no evidence of a quantum accuracy or parameter-efficiency advantage in this low-dimensional setting.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-11 18:30 · 最新观测版本
Quantum Recurrent Architectures for Financial Time Series Prediction
This study evaluates quantum classical hybrid recurrent architectures for financial time-series forecasting: a Quantum Long Short-Term Memory (QLSTM) network and Quantum Reservoir Computing (QRC) with lag-based inputs. Classical lag vectors are encoded into quantum states via amplitude encoding, which compactly represents normalized observations but requires nontrivial state preparation; the QLSTM gates and the QRC reservoir are implemented with parameterized quantum circuits, while classical optimizers train the interface and readout layers. On a monthly revenue series extended to 1056 months by a Gaussian-process--hidden-Markov generator, with a fixed chronological 70/15/15 split and one-step-ahead forecasts, we compare both models against a full-size LSTM, a classical control matched in parameter budget and interface architecture, a small plain LSTM, and classical reservoir computing, over ten seeds and against persistence, seasonal-naive and SARIMA benchmark forecasts. The QLSTM, with 2,105 parameters, is statistically indistinguishable from an LSTM 126 times larger, but equally indistinguishable from the matched classical control and from a plain LSTM of the same budget, so its parameter efficiency cannot be attributed to the quantum circuits. The quantum reservoir is worse than a classical reservoir of equal feature dimension in all ten seeds and worse than SARIMA, whereas all recurrent models and both classical reservoirs improve on SARIMA by about 2\% in RMSE. In a 24-month rolling-origin backtest the classical LSTMs degrade more slowly than the QLSTM. We find no evidence of a quantum accuracy or parameter-efficiency advantage in this low-dimensional setting.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗