跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15530 · v1

MAGIC: Modality-Aware Gini Inspection for Clinical Hallucination Detection in LMMs

首次提交 2026-11-11 22:16
版本更新 2026-11-11 22:16
雷达观测 2026-11-13 11:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Recent advances in medical large multimodal models (LMMs) have brought promising progress to clinical decision support, yet hallucination, the generation of confident but clinically unverifiable outputs, poses a critical threat to the reliability demanded in high-stakes medical settings. Existing hallucination detection methods, predominantly designed for unimodal settings, fail to capture the visual-linguistic dynamics inherent to medical imaging. We formulate the problem of hallucination detection in LMMs as disproportionate distribution of attention weights across the modalities during answer token generation. We quantify modality-specific attention concentration across layers and heads using the Gini coefficient and demonstrate statistically significant redistribution of attention mass between visual and textual tokens in hallucinated responses. We leverage these features to train a logistic regression-based classifier and evaluate it on two medical LMMs across three medical imaging modalities, demonstrating that our method achieves competitive or superior performance against contemporary hallucination detection baselines.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-11 22:16 · 最新观测版本

MAGIC: Modality-Aware Gini Inspection for Clinical Hallucination Detection in LMMs

Recent advances in medical large multimodal models (LMMs) have brought promising progress to clinical decision support, yet hallucination, the generation of confident but clinically unverifiable outputs, poses a critical threat to the reliability demanded in high-stakes medical settings. Existing hallucination detection methods, predominantly designed for unimodal settings, fail to capture the visual-linguistic dynamics inherent to medical imaging. We formulate the problem of hallucination detection in LMMs as disproportionate distribution of attention weights across the modalities during answer token generation. We quantify modality-specific attention concentration across layers and heads using the Gini coefficient and demonstrate statistically significant redistribution of attention mass between visual and textual tokens in hallucinated responses. We leverage these features to train a logistic regression-based classifier and evaluate it on two medical LMMs across three medical imaging modalities, demonstrating that our method achieves competitive or superior performance against contemporary hallucination detection baselines.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗