跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15618 · v1

Data augmentation for the generalizability and transportability of fairness in a clinical heart failure algorithm

首次提交 2026-11-11 23:36
版本更新 2026-11-11 23:36
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Synthetic data augmentation has been proposed as a way to artificially supplement clinical datasets to address fairness concerns in downstream classification algorithms. This approach is closely related to upweighting or upsampling methods employed for the problem of class imbalance, which have shown mixed empirical results in practice. Synthetic data augmentation also runs the risk of overfitting to the noise present in subgroups with relatively small sample sizes, raising both generalizability and transportability concerns. We present an empirical evaluation of synthetic data augmentation for fairness in tabular data using simulation studies as well as a real-world application of in-hospital mortality classification for heart failure patients in two distinct data samples. We implement upsampling and upweighting methods as benchmarks for the implicit fairness objective of synthetic data augmentation. Our results suggest that the fairness impacts of data augmentation are sensitive to the design of the downstream algorithm as well as the deployment context and its similarity to the training data. It is crucial that studies making generalizability and transportability claims should provide empirical support for these assertions.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-11 23:36 · 最新观测版本

Data augmentation for the generalizability and transportability of fairness in a clinical heart failure algorithm

Synthetic data augmentation has been proposed as a way to artificially supplement clinical datasets to address fairness concerns in downstream classification algorithms. This approach is closely related to upweighting or upsampling methods employed for the problem of class imbalance, which have shown mixed empirical results in practice. Synthetic data augmentation also runs the risk of overfitting to the noise present in subgroups with relatively small sample sizes, raising both generalizability and transportability concerns. We present an empirical evaluation of synthetic data augmentation for fairness in tabular data using simulation studies as well as a real-world application of in-hospital mortality classification for heart failure patients in two distinct data samples. We implement upsampling and upweighting methods as benchmarks for the implicit fairness objective of synthetic data augmentation. Our results suggest that the fairness impacts of data augmentation are sensitive to the design of the downstream algorithm as well as the deployment context and its similarity to the training data. It is crucial that studies making generalizability and transportability claims should provide empirical support for these assertions.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗