跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15711 · v1

Beyond Worst-Case Online Algorithms via Input Subsampling

首次提交 2026-11-12 00:53
版本更新 2026-11-12 00:53
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We study whether classical competitive ratios survive input subsampling, when both the online algorithm and the offline optimum are evaluated on the same subsampled input. We consider the canonical problems of prophet inequalities and ski-rental. In these settings, for any single subsampling rate, the classical worst-case ratios remain unchanged. We ask a stronger question: can one adversarial input remain worst-case at two distinct rates p>qp>q? For prophet inequalities, in the model where the policy knows the sampling rate and learns item survival online, every instance has competitive ratio strictly below 22 at one of the two rates, and we determine the tight simultaneous guarantee. For ski rental, in the fluid model where sampling scales the horizon, the answer depends on q/pq/p. Against adversarial distributions over horizons, one unrestricted randomized algorithm achieves a strict simultaneous improvement over e/(e−1)e/(e-1) for every distribution exactly when q/pq/p is below approximately 0.340.34. Requiring the algorithm to buy by the breakeven time lowers this threshold to approximately 0.310.31, showing that unlike classical ski-rental algorithms, buying later can provably help in this setting. Our results therefore reveal a new form of beyond-worst-case fragility under input subsampling: instances that are worst-case at one rate need not remain hard at two rates simultaneously.

作者备注:Accepted to ITCS 2027

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 00:53 · 最新观测版本

Beyond Worst-Case Online Algorithms via Input Subsampling

We study whether classical competitive ratios survive input subsampling, when both the online algorithm and the offline optimum are evaluated on the same subsampled input. We consider the canonical problems of prophet inequalities and ski-rental. In these settings, for any single subsampling rate, the classical worst-case ratios remain unchanged. We ask a stronger question: can one adversarial input remain worst-case at two distinct rates p>qp>q? For prophet inequalities, in the model where the policy knows the sampling rate and learns item survival online, every instance has competitive ratio strictly below 22 at one of the two rates, and we determine the tight simultaneous guarantee. For ski rental, in the fluid model where sampling scales the horizon, the answer depends on q/pq/p. Against adversarial distributions over horizons, one unrestricted randomized algorithm achieves a strict simultaneous improvement over e/(e−1)e/(e-1) for every distribution exactly when q/pq/p is below approximately 0.340.34. Requiring the algorithm to buy by the breakeven time lowers this threshold to approximately 0.310.31, showing that unlike classical ski-rental algorithms, buying later can provably help in this setting. Our results therefore reveal a new form of beyond-worst-case fragility under input subsampling: instances that are worst-case at one rate need not remain hard at two rates simultaneously.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗