跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.16211 · v1

One Fuzzer, Many Reasoners: Adaptive Neuro-Symbolic Fuzzing with Reliability-Calibrated and Context-Gated Guidance

首次提交 2026-11-12 11:04
版本更新 2026-11-12 11:04
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Neural-symbolic AI (NSAI) combines learned perception with programs, constraints, and compositional reasoning, but remains difficult to test because small semantics-preserving changes can alter grounded symbols and trigger discontinuous reasoning failures. Existing neural fuzzers mainly rely on neural coverage or representation-space feedback and do not provide a common testing interface for heterogeneous NSAI systems. We introduce NSAI-Fuzz, a unified semantics-aware fuzzing framework that separates task-specific valid mutation from architecture-neutral guided search and represents each candidate using five availability-aware, rank-normalized risk signals: boundary pressure, grounding uncertainty, representation drift, constraint violation, and archive novelty. We further propose Reliability-Calibrated Weighting (RCW), which learns dataset-model-level signal allocations from calibrated reliability, and Contextual Signal Gating (CSG), which adapts signal weights to the current candidate pool. We evaluate four NSAI systems across four reasoning tasks, nine compatible dataset-model cells, 20 policies, and 1,800 on-policy runs. Fixed five-signal guidance outperforms Random and Uniform in every cell, while RCW and CSG further improve over Fixed in all nine cells. Under matched mutation and query budgets, RCW and CSG achieve 16.17% and 16.06% aggregate failure discovery, compared with 6.06% for the strongest neural-fuzzing baseline. Wall-clock evaluation further shows that TensorFuzz requires 1.11x the runtime of RCW while achieving only 0.45x its failure throughput. These results show that effective and efficient fuzzing of heterogeneous NSAI systems benefits from a common neural-symbolic risk interface with adaptive signal allocation.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 11:04 · 最新观测版本

One Fuzzer, Many Reasoners: Adaptive Neuro-Symbolic Fuzzing with Reliability-Calibrated and Context-Gated Guidance

Neural-symbolic AI (NSAI) combines learned perception with programs, constraints, and compositional reasoning, but remains difficult to test because small semantics-preserving changes can alter grounded symbols and trigger discontinuous reasoning failures. Existing neural fuzzers mainly rely on neural coverage or representation-space feedback and do not provide a common testing interface for heterogeneous NSAI systems. We introduce NSAI-Fuzz, a unified semantics-aware fuzzing framework that separates task-specific valid mutation from architecture-neutral guided search and represents each candidate using five availability-aware, rank-normalized risk signals: boundary pressure, grounding uncertainty, representation drift, constraint violation, and archive novelty. We further propose Reliability-Calibrated Weighting (RCW), which learns dataset-model-level signal allocations from calibrated reliability, and Contextual Signal Gating (CSG), which adapts signal weights to the current candidate pool. We evaluate four NSAI systems across four reasoning tasks, nine compatible dataset-model cells, 20 policies, and 1,800 on-policy runs. Fixed five-signal guidance outperforms Random and Uniform in every cell, while RCW and CSG further improve over Fixed in all nine cells. Under matched mutation and query budgets, RCW and CSG achieve 16.17% and 16.06% aggregate failure discovery, compared with 6.06% for the strongest neural-fuzzing baseline. Wall-clock evaluation further shows that TensorFuzz requires 1.11x the runtime of RCW while achieving only 0.45x its failure throughput. These results show that effective and efficient fuzzing of heterogeneous NSAI systems benefits from a common neural-symbolic risk interface with adaptive signal allocation.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗